Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37353828›Full record

ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2023

Realist review of community coalitions and outreach interventions to increase access to primary care for vulnerable populations: a realist review.

Vivian Welch, Kevin Pottie, Caroline Gaudet, Micere Thuku, Ryan Mallard, Shannon Spenceley, Nida Amjed, Arpana Wadhwani, Elizabeth Ghogomu, Cathie Scott and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Coalition building and citizen science for radon risk reduction.Environmental research, health : ERH · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Vivian WelchBruyère Research Institute, Methods Centre, 85 Primrose, Ottawa, ON, K1R 7G5, Canada. vwelch@bruyere.org.
Kevin PottieBruyère Research Institute, C.T. Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre (CTLC), 85 Primrose, Ottawa, ON, K1R 7G5, Canada.
Caroline GaudetBruyère Research Institute, Methods Centre, 85 Primrose, Ottawa, ON, K1R 7G5, Canada.
Micere ThukuBruyère Research Institute, C.T. Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre (CTLC), 85 Primrose, Ottawa, ON, K1R 7G5, Canada.
Ryan MallardUniversity of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.
Shannon SpenceleyUniversity of Lethbridge, 4401 University Dr W, Lethbridge, AB, T1K 6T5, Canada.
Nida AmjedLakehead University, 955 Oliver Road, Thunder Bay, ON, P7B 5E1, Canada.
Arpana WadhwaniBruyère Research Institute, Methods Centre, 85 Primrose, Ottawa, ON, K1R 7G5, Canada.
Elizabeth GhogomuBruyère Research Institute, Methods Centre, 85 Primrose, Ottawa, ON, K1R 7G5, Canada.
Cathie ScottPolicyWise for Children & Families, #1000, 9925 109 Street, Edmonton, AB, T5K 2J8, Canada.
Simone DahrougeBruyère Research Institute, C.T. Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre (CTLC), 85 Primrose, Ottawa, ON, K1R 7G5, Canada.
IMPACT Team
Bruyère · CALakehead University · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Lethbridge · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are meaningful gaps in equitable access to Primary Health Care (PHC), especially for vulnerable populations after widespread reforms in Western countries. The Innovative Models Promoting Access-to-Care Transformation (IMPACT) research program is a Canadian-Australian collaboration that aims to improve access to PHC for vulnerable populations. Relationships were developed with stakeholders in six regions across Canada and Australia where access-related needs could be identified. The most promising interventions would be implemented and tested to address the needs identified. This realist review was conducted to understand how community coalition and outreach (e.g., mobile or pop-up) services improve access for underserved vulnerable residents.

objectiveTo inform the development and delivery of an innovative intervention to increase access to PHC for vulnerable populations.

methodsA realist review was conducted in collaboration with the Local Innovative Partnership (LIP) research team and the IMPACT research members who conducted the review. We performed an initial comprehensive systematic search using MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library up to October 19, 2015, and updated it on August 8, 2020. Studies were included if they focused on interventions to improve access to PHC using community coalition, outreach services or mobile delivery methods. We included Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs), and systematic reviews. Studies were screened by two independent reviewers and the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework was used for data extraction and framework analysis to obtain themes. The LIP research team was also allowed to suggest additional papers not included at screening.

resultsWe included 43 records, comprising 31 RCTs, 11 systematic reviews, and 1 case control study that was added by the LIP research team. We identified three main themes of PHC interventions to promote access for vulnerable residents, including: 1) tailoring of materials and services decreases barriers to primary health care, 2) services offered where vulnerable populations gather increases the "reach" of the interventions, 3) partnerships and collaborations lead to positive health outcomes. In addition, implementation designs and reporting elements should be considered.

conclusionRealist reviews can help guide the development of locally adapted primary health care interventions.

Indexed as

CoalitionMobile servicePrimary Health CareRE-AIMRealist ReviewVulnerable

Identifiers

PMID37353828
PMCPMC10290300
OpenAlexW4381838959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.