Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37353806›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2023

Clinical, pathological, and comprehensive molecular analysis of the uterine clear cell carcinoma: a retrospective national study from TMRG and GINECO network.

Elsa Nigon, Claudia Lefeuvre-Plesse, Alejandra Martinez, Céline Chauleur, Alain Lortholary, Laure Favier, Anne-Sophie Bats, Arnaud Guille, José AdélaÏde, Pascal Finetti and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Elsa NigonDepartment of Medical Oncology, Aix-Marseille Univ, Inserm, CNRS, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 232 Boulevard Sainte Marguerite, Marseille, France.
Claudia Lefeuvre-PlesseDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France.
Alejandra MartinezDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France.
Céline ChauleurDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de la Loire, Saint Etienne, France.
Alain LortholaryHôpital privé du Confluent, Institut de Cancérologie Catherine de Sienne, Nantes, France.
Laure FavierDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Anne-Sophie BatsDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Arnaud GuilleCRCM, Predictive Oncology laboratory, Aix-Marseille Univ, Inserm, CNRS, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.
José AdélaÏdeCRCM, Predictive Oncology laboratory, Aix-Marseille Univ, Inserm, CNRS, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.
Pascal FinettiCRCM, Predictive Oncology laboratory, Aix-Marseille Univ, Inserm, CNRS, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.
Victoire de CasteljacDepartment of Medical Oncology, Aix-Marseille Univ, Inserm, CNRS, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 232 Boulevard Sainte Marguerite, Marseille, France.
Magali ProvansalDepartment of Medical Oncology, Aix-Marseille Univ, Inserm, CNRS, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 232 Boulevard Sainte Marguerite, Marseille, France.
Emilie MamessierCRCM, Predictive Oncology laboratory, Aix-Marseille Univ, Inserm, CNRS, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.
François BertucciDepartment of Medical Oncology, Aix-Marseille Univ, Inserm, CNRS, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 232 Boulevard Sainte Marguerite, Marseille, France.
Isabelle Ray-CoquardDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Renaud SabatierDepartment of Medical Oncology, Aix-Marseille Univ, Inserm, CNRS, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 232 Boulevard Sainte Marguerite, Marseille, France. sabatierr@ipc.unicancer.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-5821-682X
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRCentre Eugène Marquis · FRCentre Georges François Leclerc · FRHôpital privé du Confluent · FRInstitut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse Oncopole · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUterine clear cell carcinomas (CCC) represent less than 5% of uterine cancers. Their biological characteristics and clinical management remain uncertain. A multicenter study to explore both clinical and molecular features of these rare tumors was conducted.

methodsThis multicenter retrospective national study was performed within the French TMRG (Rare Gynecologic Malignant Tumors) network. Clinical data and, when available, FFPE blocks were collected. Clinical features, treatments, and outcome (progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)) were analyzed and correlated to the protein (tissue micro-array), RNA (Nanostring nCounter

resultsSixty-eight patients with uterine CCC were enrolled, 61 from endometrial localization and 5 with cervix localization. Median age at diagnosis was 68.9 years old (range 19-89.7). Most tumors were diagnosed at an early stage (78% FIGO stage I-II). Hysterectomy (performed in 90%) and lymph node dissection (80%) were the most frequent surgical treatment. More than 70% of patients received external beam radiotherapy and 57% received brachytherapy. Nearly half (46%) of the patients received chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 24.7 months, median PFS was 64.8 months (95 CI [5.3-124.4]) and median OS was 79.7 (IC95 [31.0-128.4]). Low hormone receptor expression (13% estrogen-receptor positive), frequent PI3K pathway alterations (58% PTEN loss, 50% PIK3CA mutations), and P53 abnormalities (41%) were observed. Mismatch repair deficiency was identified in 20%. P16 expression was associated with shorter PFS (HR = 5.88, 95 CI [1.56-25], p = 0.009). Transcriptomic analyzes revealed a specific transcriptomic profile notably with a high expression of immune response-associated genes in uterine CCC displaying a very good overall prognosis.

conclusionsUterine CCC reported to be potentially MSI high, hormone receptors negative, and sometimes TP53 mutated. However, some patients with immune response-associated features and better prognosis may be candidate to treatment de-escalation and immunotherapy.

Indexed as

CarcinomaUterine NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overComparative Genomic HybridizationFemaleHormonesHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultHormonesPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesClear cell carcinomaGene expression profilingGenomicsTissue micro-arrayUterine cancer

Identifiers

PMID37353806
PMCPMC10288685
OpenAlexW4381799797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.