Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37353773›Full record

Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2023

Effects of intraoperative esketamine addition on gastrointestinal function after benign gynaecological laparoscopic surgery: a double-blind, randomized controlled study.

Yuhua Ma, Ran Zhang, Xue Cao, Lin Zhang, Suozhu Bao, Jie Ren, Weiwei Ma

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuhua Ma *Department of Anesthesiology, Xing'an Meng People's Hospital, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Xing'an Meng, Inner Mongolia, 137400, China.
Ran Zhang *Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China. 120396715@qq.com.
Xue CaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Xing'an Meng People's Hospital, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Xing'an Meng, Inner Mongolia, 137400, China.
Lin ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Xing'an Meng People's Hospital, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Xing'an Meng, Inner Mongolia, 137400, China.
Suozhu BaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Xing'an Meng People's Hospital, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Xing'an Meng, Inner Mongolia, 137400, China.
Jie RenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Xing'an Meng People's Hospital, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Xing'an Meng, Inner Mongolia, 137400, China.
Weiwei MaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Xing'an Meng People's Hospital, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Xing'an Meng, Inner Mongolia, 137400, China.
Inner Mongolia People's Hospital · CNPeking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGastrointestinal hypokinesis can occur transiently after benign gynecologic surgery. Opioids cause the side effect of postoperative gastrointestinal hypokinesis, but an opioid-sparing anaesthetic protocol based on esketamine reduces intraoperative opioid consumption. Therefore, this study hypothesised that an opioid-sparing anaesthetic protocol based on esketamine would shorten the gastrointestinal function recovery time after benign gynaecological laparoscopic surgery.

methodsThis was a prospective randomized controlled double-blind study conducted in a single centre. All patients scheduled for elective benign laparoscopic gynaecological surgery at Xing'an Meng People's Hospital, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, from November 2021 to April 2022 were consecutively enrolled and randomly divided into the opioid-sparing anaesthesia group (Group OS) and the conventional anaesthesia group (Group C). Postoperative first exhaust time, feeding time and postoperative nausea and/or vomiting (PONV) were analyzed in both groups.

resultsA total of 71 patients were enrolled in this study, including 35 in Group OS and 36 in Group C. The general condition, operative time, type of surgery, intraoperative bleeding, intraoperative fluid volume and intraoperative urine volume were not statistically different between the two groups. Compared with Group C, significantly shorter first postoperative flatus time (11 [8, 14] h vs. 14 [11, 18], p = 0.003) and anaesthesia resuscitation time (7 [6, 9] h vs. 9 [7, 11] h, p = 0.013)were observed in the OS group. The incidence of PONV in Group OS was significantly lower compared with Group C (11.4% vs. 41.7%, p = 0.007).

conclusionThe esketamine-based opioid-sparing anaesthetic protocol can shorten the postoperative first flatus time after benign laparoscopic surgery in gynaecology, and reduce the incidence of PONV. In addition, the application of esketamine may reduce the postoperative opioid dose requirement of patients.

trial registrationThis study was registered with the China Clinical Trials Registry (registration number: ChiCTR2100052528, 30/10/2021).

Indexed as

KetamineLaparoscopyPostoperative PainAnalgesics, OpioidDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFlatulenceGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHumansPostoperative Nausea and VomitingProspective StudiesAnalgesics, OpioidEsketamineKetamineBenign gynaecological lesionsEsketamineGastrointestinal functionLaparoscopic surgeryOpioid-sparing anaesthesia

Identifiers

PMID37353773
PMCPMC10288755
OpenAlexW4381741866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.