Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37353733›Full record

ArticleBMC ophthalmology2023

Case report of the evidence of a spontaneous Reverse Pulfrich effect in monovision after cataract surgery.

Victor Rodriguez-Lopez, Carlos Dorronsoro

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Victor Rodriguez-LopezInstitute of Optics, Spanish National Research Council (IO-CSIC), Serrano 121, Madrid, Spain. victor.rl@io.cfmac.csic.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0854-8006
Carlos DorronsoroInstitute of Optics, Spanish National Research Council (IO-CSIC), Serrano 121, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

Instituto de Salud Carlos III PID2020-115191RB-I00"la Caixa" Foundation ID 100010434"la Caixa" Foundation LCF/BQ/DR19/11740032Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades CSIC LINKA20122Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades FIS2017-84753-RMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades ISCIII DTS2016/00127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCataracts affect the optics of the eye in terms of absorption, blur, and scattering. When cataracts are unilateral, they cause differences between the eyes that can produce visual discomfort and harm binocular vision. These interocular differences can also induce differences in the processing speed of the eyes that may cause a spontaneous Pulfrich effect, a visual illusion provoking important depth misperceptions. Interocular differences in light level, like those present in unilateral cataracts, can cause the Classic Pulfrich effect, and interocular differences in blur, like those present in monovision, a common correction for presbyopia, can cause the Reverse Pulfrich effect. The visual system may be able to adapt, or not, to the new optical condition, depending on the degree of the cataract and the magnitude of the monovision correction. CASE PRESENTATION: Here, we report a unique case of a 45-year-old patient that underwent unilateral cataract surgery resulting in a monovision correction of 2.5 diopters (D): left eye emmetropic after the surgery compensated with a monofocal intraocular lens and right eye myopic with a spherical equivalent of -2.50 D. This patient suffered severe symptoms in binocular vision, which can be explained by a spontaneous Pulfrich effect (a delay measured of 4.82 ms, that could be eliminated with a 0.19 optical density filter). After removing the monovision with clear lens extraction in the second eye, symptoms disappeared. We demonstrate that, at least in this patient, both Classic and Reverse Pulfrich effects coexist after unilateral cataract surgery and that can be readapted by reverting the interocular differences. Besides, we report that the adaptation/readaptation process to the Reverse Pulfrich effect happens in a timeframe of weeks, as opposed to the Classic Pulfrich effect, known to have timeframes of days. Additionally, we used the illusion measured in the laboratory to quantify the relevance of the spontaneous Pulfrich effect in different visual scenarios and tasks, using geometrical models and optic flow algorithms.

conclusionsMeasuring the different versions of the Pulfrich effect might help to understand the visual discomfort reported by many patients after cataract surgery or with monovision and could guide compensation or intervention strategies.

Indexed as

CataractCataract ExtractionLenses, IntraocularPresbyopiaHumansLens Implantation, IntraocularMiddle AgedVision, MonocularAdaptationBlurCase reportCataractsDepth misperceptionMonovisionPulfrich effect

Identifiers

PMID37353733
PMCPMC10290313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.