ArticleThe Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation2023
A new method for classifying prognostic risk factors in lung transplant candidates.
Article in The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preoperative Risk-assessment Score for Elective Total Aortic Arch Repair: AAORTA Risk Tool.Aorta (Stamford, Conn.) · 2026Article
- Article
- Creating synthetic populations in transplantation: A Bayesian approach enabling simulation without registry re-sampling.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPredicting risk of waitlist mortality and subsequent classification of lung transplant candidates has been difficult due to inter-relatedness of risk factors, differential risk across populations, and changes in relationships over time. We developed a clinically intuitive indexing system to simplify mortality risk assessment.
methodsScientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data from February 19, 2015, to May 26, 2020 (n = 13,726) were used to estimate 3 constructs. Airway and oxygen function indices were estimated using confirmatory factor analysis and hierarchical clustering was used to derive respiratory support clusters. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to characterize event-free waitlist survival by constructs (3), age, sex, and diagnosis group. Model performance was compared to the Lung Allocation Score/Composite Allocation Score (LAS/CAS).
resultsAirway and oxygen function indices were created with substantive factor loadings forced expiratory volume (0.86), forced vital capacity (0.64), partial pressure of carbon dioxide (0.56) and PO
conclusionsReducing the dimensionality of waitlist mortality risk offers an opportunity to identify clinical phenotypes that are more nuanced and thus more interpretable than current risk assessment provided by the LAS/CAS models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.