Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37352447›Full record

ArticleMilitary psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association

Administrative records-based criterion measures.

Martin C Yu, Matthew C Reeder, David Dorsey, Matthew T Allen

Abstract readComment
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Commentary on the criterion problem in the US Department of Defense: Policy and operational considerations.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association
    Article
  2. Introduction to the special issue on criterion measurement.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association
    Article
  3. Comments on the articles dealing with individual performance criteria that are included in this special issue ofMilitary psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association
    Article
  4. Identification and evaluation of criterion measurement methods.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Martin C YuHuman Resources Research Organization, Alexandria, Virginia, USA.
Matthew C ReederHuman Resources Research Organization, Alexandria, Virginia, USA.
David DorseyHuman Resources Research Organization, Alexandria, Virginia, USA.
Matthew T AllenHuman Resources Research Organization, Alexandria, Virginia, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper covers considerations in using criterion measures based on administrative data. We begin with a conceptual framework for understanding and evaluating administrative criterion measures as "objective" rather than (ratings-based) assessments of job performance. We then describe the associated advantages (e.g., availability) and disadvantages (e.g., contamination) of using administrative data for criterion-related validation purposes. Best practices in the use of administrative data for validation purposes, including procedures for (a) handling missing data, (b) performing data checks, and (c) reporting detailed decision rules so future researchers can replicate the analyses are also described. Finally, we discuss "modern data management" approaches for improving administrative data for supporting organizational decision-making.

Indexed as

Administrative recordsarchival datacriterion measurementmodern data managementoutcome measures

Identifiers

PMID37352447
PMCPMC10291909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.