Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37352446›Full record

ReviewMilitary psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association

Designing criterion measures for physically demanding jobs.

Deborah L Gebhardt, Todd A Baker

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Commentary on the criterion problem in the US Department of Defense: Policy and operational considerations.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association
    Article
  4. Introduction to the special issue on criterion measurement.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association
    Article
  5. Comments on the articles dealing with individual performance criteria that are included in this special issue ofMilitary psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Deborah L GebhardtHuman Resources Research Organization, Alexandria, VA, USA.
Todd A BakerHuman Resources Research Organization, Alexandria, VA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The

Indexed as

Military PersonnelOccupationsHumansPostureUnited StatesWorkforceCriterion measurephysicalsimulationssupervisor ratingswork sample

Identifiers

PMID37352446
PMCPMC10291931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.