Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37352356›Full record

ArticleScience advances2023

Cheap gulp foraging of a giga-predator enables efficient exploitation of sparse prey.

Simone K A Videsen, Malene Simon, Fredrik Christiansen, Ari Friedlaender, Jeremy Goldbogen, Hans Malte, Paolo Segre, Tobias Wang, Mark Johnson, Peter T Madsen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Sprint-like cardiac dynamics support repeated acrobatic lunges in foraging rorqual whales.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Respiration rates and inferred mass-specific field metabolic rates decline with body size among five sympatric cetaceans.Journal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Simone K A VidesenZoophysiology, Department of Biology, Aarhus University, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7563-2470
Malene SimonGreenland Climate Research Centre, Greenland Institute of Natural Resources, Nuuk, Greenland.ORCID 0000-0002-9777-8817
Fredrik ChristiansenAarhus Institute of Advanced Studies, Aarhus University, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9090-8458
Ari FriedlaenderInstitute of Marine Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.
Jeremy GoldbogenHopkins Marine Station, Department of Biology, Stanford University, Pacific Grove, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4170-7294
Hans MalteZoophysiology, Department of Biology, Aarhus University, Denmark.
Paolo SegreHopkins Marine Station, Department of Biology, Stanford University, Pacific Grove, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2396-2670
Tobias WangZoophysiology, Department of Biology, Aarhus University, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4350-3682
Mark JohnsonZoophysiology, Department of Biology, Aarhus University, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-8424-3197
Peter T MadsenZoophysiology, Department of Biology, Aarhus University, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5208-5259
Aarhus University · DKPacific University · USGrønlands Naturinstitut · GLUniversity of California, Santa Cruz · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The giant rorqual whales are believed to have a massive food turnover driven by a high-intake lunge feeding style aptly described as the world's largest biomechanical action. This high-drag feeding behavior is thought to limit dive times and constrain rorquals to target only the densest prey patches, making them vulnerable to disturbance and habitat change. Using biologging tags to estimate energy expenditure as a function of feeding rates on 23 humpback whales, we show that lunge feeding is energetically cheap. Such inexpensive foraging means that rorquals are flexible in the quality of prey patches they exploit and therefore more resilient to environmental fluctuations and disturbance. As a consequence, the food turnover and hence the ecological role of these marine giants have likely been overestimated.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorHumpback WhaleAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaEnergy MetabolismFood

Identifiers

PMID37352356
PMCPMC10289661
OpenAlexW4381801636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.