ArticlePloS one2023
Effect of speech-stimulus degradation on phoneme-related potential.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Stimulus Complexity on the Phonemic Restoration Effect.Audiology research · 2026Article
- Differential electroencephalography responses in speech perception between native and non-native speakers.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Auditory evoked potential (AEP) has been used to evaluate the degree of hearing and speech cognition. Because AEP generates a very small voltage relative to ambient noise, a repetitive presentation of a stimulus, such as a tone, word, or short sentence, should be employed to generate ensemble averages over trials. However, the stimulation of repetitive short words and sentences may present an unnatural situation to a subject. Phoneme-related potentials (PRPs), which are evoked-responses to typical phonemic stimuli, can be extracted from electroencephalography (EEG) data in response to a continuous storybook. In this study, we investigated the effects of spectrally degraded speech stimuli on PRPs. The EEG data in response to the spectrally degraded and natural storybooks were recorded from normal listeners, and the PRP components for 10 vowels and 12 consonants were extracted. The PRP responses to a vocoded (spectrally-degraded) storybook showed a statistically significant lower peak amplitude and were prolonged compared with those of a natural storybook. The findings in this study suggest that PRPs can be considered a potential tool to evaluate hearing and speech cognition as other AEPs. Moreover, PRPs can provide the details of phonological processing and phonemic awareness to understand poor speech intelligibility. Further investigation with the hearing impaired is required prior to clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.