ArticlePloS one2023
Deep-Fuzz: A synergistic integration of deep learning and fuzzy water flows for fine-grained nuclei segmentation in digital pathology.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robust semantic segmentation of tumour micro-environment is one of the major open challenges in machine learning enabled computational pathology. Though deep learning based systems have made significant progress, their task agnostic data driven approach often lacks the contextual grounding necessary in biomedical applications. We present a novel fuzzy water flow scheme that takes the coarse segmentation output of a base deep learning framework to then provide a more fine-grained and instance level robust segmentation output. Our two stage synergistic segmentation method, Deep-Fuzz, works especially well for overlapping objects, and achieves state-of-the-art performance in four public cell nuclei segmentation datasets. We also show through visual examples how our final output is better aligned with pathological insights, and thus more clinically interpretable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.