Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37351939›Full record

SynthesisJMIR public health and surveillance2023

COVID-19 Contact Tracing Strategies During the First Wave of the Pandemic: Systematic Review of Published Studies.

Anna Maria Vincenza Amicosante, Annalisa Rosso, Fabio Bernardini, Elisa Guglielmi, Erica Eugeni, Filippo Da Re, Giovanni Baglio

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anna Maria Vincenza Amicosante *Research and International Relations Unit, Italian National Agency for Regional Healthcare Services, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8323-1175
Annalisa Rosso *Research and International Relations Unit, Italian National Agency for Regional Healthcare Services, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0537-5130
Fabio BernardiniResearch and International Relations Unit, Italian National Agency for Regional Healthcare Services, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9561-8895
Elisa GuglielmiResearch and International Relations Unit, Italian National Agency for Regional Healthcare Services, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7395-4049
Erica EugeniResearch and International Relations Unit, Italian National Agency for Regional Healthcare Services, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5808-568X
Filippo Da ReRegional Directorate of Prevention, Food Safety, Veterinary, Public Health-Veneto Region, Venice, Italy.ORCID 0009-0006-7366-0108
Giovanni BaglioResearch and International Relations Unit, Italian National Agency for Regional Healthcare Services, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8313-794X
Regione del Veneto · ITUniversity of Ferrara · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContact tracing (CT) represented one of the core activities for the prevention and control of COVID-19 in the early phase of the pandemic. Several guidance documents were developed by international public health agencies and national authorities on the organization of COVID-19 CT activities. While most research on CT focused on the use digital tools or relied on modelling techniques to estimate the efficacy of interventions, poor evidence is available on the real-world implementation of CT strategies and on the organizational models adopted during the initial phase of the emergency to set up CT activities.

objectiveWe aimed to provide a comprehensive picture of the organizational aspects of CT activities during the first wave of the pandemic through the systematic identification and description of CT strategies used in different settings during the period from March to June 2020.

methodsA systematic review of published studies describing organizational models of COVID-19 CT strategies developed in real-world settings was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched. Studies not providing a description of the organizational aspects of CT strategies and studies reporting or modelling theoretical strategies or focusing on the description of digital technologies' properties were excluded. Quality of reporting was assessed by using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication Checklist for Population Health and Policy. We developed a narrative synthesis, using a conceptual framework to map the extracted studies broken down by target population.

resultsWe retrieved a total of 1638 studies, of which 17 were included in the narrative synthesis; 7 studies targeted the general population and 10 studies described CT activities carried out in specific population subgroups. Our review identified some common elements across studies used to develop CT activities, including decentralization of CT activities, involvement of trained nonpublic health resources (eg, university students or civil servants), use of informatics tools for CT management, interagency collaboration, and community engagement. CT strategies implemented in the workplace envisaged a strong collaboration with occupational health services. Outreach activities were shown to increase CT efficiency in susceptible groups, such as people experiencing homelessness. Data on the effectiveness of CT strategies are scarce, with only few studies reporting on key performance indicators.

conclusionsDespite the lack of systematically collected data on CT effectiveness, our findings can provide some indication for the future planning and development of CT strategies for infectious disease control, mainly in terms of coordination mechanisms and the use of human and technical resources needed for the rapid development of CT activities. Further research on the organizational models of CT strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic would be required to contribute to a more robust evidence-making process.

Indexed as

COVID-19Contact TracingHumansPandemicsPublic HealthWorkplacecommunity engagementcontact tracingCOVID-19digital tooldisease controlinfectious diseasepublic healthSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID37351939
PMCPMC10337430
OpenAlexW4320806913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.