Observational studyJournal of medical Internet research2023
Representation Learning and Spectral Clustering for the Development and External Validation of Dynamic Sepsis Phenotypes: Observational Cohort Study.
Observational study in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systems Bioengineering of Septic Shock Metabolism: Citrulline, β-Hydroxybutyrate and Plasma Biomarker-Based Phenotyping.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- The role of hemoadsorption in septic shock: toward a personalized approach.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Review
- Multicenter Validation of Clinical Sepsis Phenotypes.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-driven cluster analysis for identifying clinical phenotypes in suspected sepsis patients in the emergency department.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Dynamic sepsis endotypes: instability or expected signal of biological progression? Author's reply.Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- Dynamic sepsis endotypes: instability or expected signal of biological progression?Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- Integrated Pulmonary Severity Score (IPSS) for COPD: A Psycho-Respiratory Risk Index Supported by Explainable Machine Learning.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence- and Machine Learning-Assisted Subphenotyping for Personalized Immunotherapy in Sepsis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Multimodal Artificial Intelligence for Precision Critical Care: A Scoping Review.Health data science · 2026Review
- The Neuroimmune Axis in Sepsis: From Pathophysiological Circuits to Precision Neuromodulation.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
- Landmark-based early perfusion phenotyping for prognostic stratification in septic shock: derivation in MIMIC-IV and fixed-parameter external transportability assessment in eICU.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Transforming sepsis management: AI-driven innovations in early detection and tailored therapies.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Review
- Why Has Biomarker-Guided Fluid Resuscitation for Sepsis Not Been Implemented in Clinical Practice?Critical care explorations · 2025Review
- Bundle compliance patterns in septic shock and their association with patient outcomes: an unsupervised cluster analysis.Internal and emergency medicine · 2025Article
- The role of artificial intelligence in sepsis in the Emergency Department: a narrative review.Annals of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Blood leukocyte-based clusters in patients with traumatic brain injury.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence-assisted phenotyping of sepsis: Research progress, clinical challenges, and translational prospects.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRecent attempts at clinical phenotyping for sepsis have shown promise in identifying groups of patients with distinct treatment responses. Nonetheless, the replicability and actionability of these phenotypes remain an issue because the patient trajectory is a function of both the patient's physiological state and the interventions they receive.
objectiveWe aimed to develop a novel approach for deriving clinical phenotypes using unsupervised learning and transition modeling.
methodsForty commonly used clinical variables from the electronic health record were used as inputs to a feed-forward neural network trained to predict the onset of sepsis. Using spectral clustering on the representations from this network, we derived and validated consistent phenotypes across a diverse cohort of patients with sepsis. We modeled phenotype dynamics as a Markov decision process with transitions as a function of the patient's current state and the interventions they received.
resultsFour consistent and distinct phenotypes were derived from over 11,500 adult patients who were admitted from the University of California, San Diego emergency department (ED) with sepsis between January 1, 2016, and January 31, 2020. Over 2000 adult patients admitted from the University of California, Irvine ED with sepsis between November 4, 2017, and August 4, 2022, were involved in the external validation. We demonstrate that sepsis phenotypes are not static and evolve in response to physiological factors and based on interventions. We show that roughly 45% of patients change phenotype membership within the first 6 hours of ED arrival. We observed consistent trends in patient dynamics as a function of interventions including early administration of antibiotics.
conclusionsWe derived and describe 4 sepsis phenotypes present within 6 hours of triage in the ED. We observe that the administration of a 30 mL/kg fluid bolus may be associated with worse outcomes in certain phenotypes, whereas prompt antimicrobial therapy is associated with improved outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.