Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37351885›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2023

Effect of a Nurse Navigation Intervention on Mental Symptoms in Patients With Psychological Vulnerability and Breast Cancer: The REBECCA Randomized Clinical Trial.

Pernille Envold Bidstrup, Christoffer Johansen, Niels Kroman, Federica Belmonte, Helle Duriaud, Susanne Oksbjerg Dalton, Kenneth Geving Andersen, Birgitte Mertz

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03254875 (Individually Tailored Rehabilitation After Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03254875 nacompletednot on this map

Individually Tailored Rehabilitation After Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorDanish Cancer SocietyRan2017 to 2021Enrolled309ConditionsBreast CancerArmsIndividually tailored nurse navigation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Application of patient navigation programs across the entire continuum of breast cancer care: a GRADE-assessed systematic review with meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pernille Envold BidstrupPsychological Aspects of Cancer, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christoffer JohansenPsychological Aspects of Cancer, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Niels KromanDanish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Federica BelmonteStatistics and Data Analysis, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Helle DuriaudDepartment of Breast Surgery, Herlev/Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Susanne Oksbjerg DaltonSurvivorship and Inequality in Cancer, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kenneth Geving AndersenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Birgitte MertzDepartment of Breast Surgery, Herlev/Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The unmet needs regarding symptom management of psychological distress among patients with breast cancer must be addressed. However, little evidence exists on effective interventions, such as nurse navigation. Objective: To compare the long-term effects of the REBECCA (Rehabilitation After Breast Cancer) nurse navigation intervention vs usual care in patients with breast cancer who were psychologically vulnerable. Design, Setting, and Participants: This parallel randomized clinical trial recruited and evaluated for eligibility adult female patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer and symptoms of psychological distress (distress score of ≥7 points on Distress Thermometer) at Rigshospitalet in Copenhagen, Denmark, from August 2017 to October 2019. This study continued the work of a pilot study, extending the follow-up to 18 months. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were randomized to either standard care or the REBECCA intervention. Intention-to-treat analyses were performed from June 2021 to October 2022. Interventions: Patients who were randomized to the REBECCA intervention received nurse navigation and symptom screening as well as standard care. Standard care included regular treatment, nurse support at chemotherapy and radiotherapy appointments, and municipality-based rehabilitation. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was distress, as measured using the Distress Thermometer. The secondary outcomes included symptoms of anxiety, symptoms of depression, breast cancer-specific health-related quality of life, fear of recurrence, sleep, cognitive function, patient activation, pain, health behavior, body mass index, and need for support. Long-term effects at 6, 12, and 18 months were examined using mixed-effect models, adjusting for randomization strata of age and treatment modality. Results: A total of 309 female patients were included in the analysis, with 153 patients randomized to the standard care group and 156 patients randomized to the REBECCA intervention group. Mean (SD) age was 56 (11) years with only small between-group differences. Patients receiving the REBECCA intervention compared with standard care had reduced (although not significant) symptoms of distress, especially at the 12-month follow-up (estimated effect = -0.51 [95% CI, -1.05 to 0.04]; effect size [ES] = -0.49). Significant effects were seen for symptoms of depression at 6 months (estimated effect = -1.39 [95% CI, -2.33 to -0.44]; ES = -0.27), and breast cancer-specific health-related quality of life at 12 months (estimated effect = 4.03 [95% CI, 1.28- 6.77]; ES = 0.31). Nonsignificant reductions were seen for symptoms of anxiety at 6 months (estimated effect = -1.00 [95% CI, -1.95 to -0.06]; ES = -0.21) and 12 months (estimated effect = -1.01 [95% CI, -1.97 to -0.04]; ES = -0.21), and a nonsignificant increase was seen for patient activation at 18 months (estimated effect = 3.52 [95% CI, -0.09 to 7.12]; ES = 0.25). Stronger intervention effects were observed for younger age, low patient activation, less education, and low social support. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this study indicate that patients with breast cancer who were psychologically vulnerable (ie, having moderate to high psychological distress) did not experience significant reduction in distress with nurse navigation. Further research is needed to develop the intervention's framework and investigate its potential use in clinical practice. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03254875.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAdultAnxietyDepressionFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID37351885
PMCPMC10290249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.