Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37351815›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research communications2023

A study of the inter- and intra-operator variability on selected echocardiographic measurements in dogs.

Sara Ghilardi, Danitza Pradelli, Rita Rizzi, Michele Polli, Mara Bagardi, Roberto A Santilli, Paola G Brambilla, Claudio M Bussadori

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sara Ghilardi *Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences - DIVAS, University of Milan, Lodi, LO, 26900, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7738-3204
Danitza Pradelli *Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences - DIVAS, University of Milan, Lodi, LO, 26900, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5471-7547
Rita RizziDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences - DIVAS, University of Milan, Lodi, LO, 26900, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6147-2437
Michele PolliDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences - DIVAS, University of Milan, Lodi, LO, 26900, Italy. michele.polli@unimi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0129-0161
Mara BagardiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences - DIVAS, University of Milan, Lodi, LO, 26900, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5247-3796
Roberto A SantilliAnicura Clinica Veterinaria Malpensa, Samarate, VA, 21017, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5937-2050
Paola G BrambillaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences - DIVAS, University of Milan, Lodi, LO, 26900, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4255-555X
Claudio M BussadoriDepartment of Cardiology, Clinica Veterinaria Gran Sasso, Milan, MI, 20131, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3029-1155

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Standard transthoracic echocardiography is considered the non-invasive gold standard for the diagnosis of most cardiac diseases. Defining reproducibility, repeatability, and reliability of this exam is imperative to reduce errors in clinical evaluations. The present study aimed at: (1) evaluating the reproducibility and repeatability of 15 echocardiographic parameters in dogs by analyzing measurements obtained from several operators with different levels of experience and comparing them to the ones obtained from two board-certified operators (gold standards - GSs); (2) assessing whether different formative paths have an influence on the variability of the echocardiographic measurements. Fifty-one operators have been included in this study, along with two diplomates of the European College of Veterinary Internal Medicine - Cardiology. Ten dogs were enrolled, 5 Golden Retrievers and 5 Cavalier King Charles Spaniels. Echocardiographic examination was performed on each dog by one GS and several operators on the same day. Results show the highest deviation from the GS and a poor inter-operator reproducibility for the M-mode measurements of the interventricular septum and the left ventricular free wall. Differently, M-mode-obtained internal diameters of the left ventricle in systole and diastole, and measurements of the aortic annulus and root show moderate to excellent intra- and inter-operator reliability and a good concordance with the GSs, demonstrating that all the operators correctly assess left ventricular systolic function and dilation, and evaluate the aortic valve. Furthermore, a specialist clinical activity, more than the acquired theoretical knowledge, affects the reliability of the echocardiographic examination by reducing the difference from the GS' measurements.

Indexed as

EchocardiographyVentricular Function, LeftAnimalsDogsHumansReproducibility of ResultsSystoleEchocardiographyGold standardReliabilityRepeatabilityReproducibility

Identifiers

PMID37351815
PMCPMC10698089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.