Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37351775›Full record

ArticleAmbio2023

Nonpoint source pollution measures in the Clean Water Act have no detectable impact on decadal trends in nutrient concentrations in U.S. inland waters.

Nathan Tomczyk, Laura Naslund, Carolyn Cummins, Emily V Bell, Phillip Bumpers, Amy D Rosemond

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nathan Tomczyk *Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, 140 E. Green St., Athens, GA, 30602, USA. nathan.tomczyk@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3131-1851
Laura Naslund *Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, 140 E. Green St., Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
Carolyn CumminsOdum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, 140 E. Green St., Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
Emily V BellSchool of Public & International Affairs, University of Georgia, 415 Baldwin Hall, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
Phillip BumpersOdum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, 140 E. Green St., Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
Amy D RosemondOdum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, 140 E. Green St., Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
University of Georgia · US

Funding

National Science Foundation DEB-1655789
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Clean Water Act (CWA) of 1972 regulates water quality in U.S. inland waters under a system of cooperative federalism in which states are delegated implementation and enforcement authority of CWA provisions by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. We leveraged heterogeneity in state implementation of the CWA to evaluate the efficacy of its nonpoint source provisions in reducing nutrient pollution, the leading cause of water quality impairment in U.S. inland waters. We used national survey data to estimate changes in nutrient concentrations over a decade and evaluated the effect of state-level policy implementation. We found no evidence to support an effect of (i) grant spending on nonpoint source pollution remediation, (ii) nutrient criteria development, or (iii) water quality monitoring intensity on 10-year trends in nutrient concentrations. These results suggest that the current federal policy paradigm for improving water quality is not creating desired outcomes.

Indexed as

Environmental Restoration and RemediationNon-Point Source PollutionEnvironmental MonitoringUnited StatesUnited States Environmental Protection AgencyWater PollutionWater QualityAmmoniumNitratePhosphorusPolicy evaluationSection 303Section 319

Identifiers

PMID37351775
PMCPMC10406756
OpenAlexW4381716779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.