Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37351618›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2023

Outcomes of surveillance versus adjuvant treatment for patients with stage-I seminoma: a single-center experience.

Goncagul Akdag, Ozkan Alan, Akif Dogan, Zeynep Yuksel, Sedat Yildirim, Oguzcan Kinikoglu, Emre Kudu, Heves Surmeli, Hatice Odabas, Mahmut Emre Yildirim and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Goncagul AkdagDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kirdar City Hospital, Health Science University, Cevizli, D-100 Güney Yanyol, Cevizli Mevkii No: 47, Kartal, 34865, Istanbul, Turkey. akdaggoncagul@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6221-0623
Ozkan AlanDivision of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6635-2012
Akif DoganDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kirdar City Hospital, Health Science University, Cevizli, D-100 Güney Yanyol, Cevizli Mevkii No: 47, Kartal, 34865, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4275-2414
Zeynep YukselDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kirdar City Hospital, Health Science University, Cevizli, D-100 Güney Yanyol, Cevizli Mevkii No: 47, Kartal, 34865, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2929-5039
Sedat YildirimDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kirdar City Hospital, Health Science University, Cevizli, D-100 Güney Yanyol, Cevizli Mevkii No: 47, Kartal, 34865, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2423-6902
Oguzcan KinikogluDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kirdar City Hospital, Health Science University, Cevizli, D-100 Güney Yanyol, Cevizli Mevkii No: 47, Kartal, 34865, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5983-3291
Emre KuduDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1422-5927
Heves SurmeliDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kirdar City Hospital, Health Science University, Cevizli, D-100 Güney Yanyol, Cevizli Mevkii No: 47, Kartal, 34865, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1604-8466
Hatice OdabasDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kirdar City Hospital, Health Science University, Cevizli, D-100 Güney Yanyol, Cevizli Mevkii No: 47, Kartal, 34865, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5757-4705
Mahmut Emre YildirimDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kirdar City Hospital, Health Science University, Cevizli, D-100 Güney Yanyol, Cevizli Mevkii No: 47, Kartal, 34865, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5360-5949
Nedim TuranDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kirdar City Hospital, Health Science University, Cevizli, D-100 Güney Yanyol, Cevizli Mevkii No: 47, Kartal, 34865, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1140-8779
Dr Lütfi Kırdar Kartal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRKoç University · TRMarmara University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTesticular germ cell tumors (seminoma/non-seminoma) are the most common carcinomas in young males, comprising approximately 1% of all carcinomas. In stage-I disease, orchiectomy can cure approximately 85% of patients. Post-surgical options are adjuvant therapy and active surveillance. Our study examined the effects of management options on stage-I seminoma patients followed in our center.

methodsWe evaluated the patients with stage-I testicular seminoma who underwent radical orchiectomy and followed up in the oncology center between 2001 and 2022. The outcomes of management options, survivals were retrospectively analyzed. The prognostic significance of risk factors for relapse on survival was evaluated.

resultsOf the 140 patients with stage-I seminoma, 49 (35%) were treated with adjuvant therapy, and 91 (65%) underwent surveillance. The median follow-up duration was 37 months. During the follow-up period, nine patients in the active surveillance group and four in the adjuvant therapy group had a recurrence. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.67). In the surveillance group, the univariate and multivariate analyzes identified the presence of lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.005, HR: 0.13) as significant prognostic factor for disease-free survival (DFS). In the surveillance cohort, the 5-year DFS rate was 60% for patients with lymphovascular invasion and 93% for those without. There was statistical significance between the two groups (p = 0.003).

conclusionOur study shows that adjuvant therapy does not significantly improve DFS compared to surveillance in patients. In addition, it has been shown that lymphovascular invasion is an important prognostic indicator for DFS in determining the treatment strategy.

Indexed as

CarcinomaSeminomaTesticular NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingOrchiectomyRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRetrospective StudiesAdjuvant therapyDisease free survivalLymphovascular invasionOverall survivalSeminomaSurveillance

Identifiers

PMID37351618
OpenAlexW4381716888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.