Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37351614›Full record

ReviewOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2023

Real-world evidence: new opportunities for osteoporosis research. Recommendations from a Working Group from the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO).

Rebecca J Moon, Jean-Yves Reginster, Nasser M Al-Daghri, Jotheeswaran A Thiyagarajan, Charlotte Beaudart, Olivier Bruyère, Nansa Burlet, Manju Chandran, Mario Coelho da Silva, Philip G Conaghan and 19 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. PTH1 receptor agonists for fracture risk: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Romosozumab in older adults: real-world patterns in fracture liaison service cohort.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Aging-Driven Inter-Organ Crosstalk in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: From Immunometabolic Drift to Multisystem Frailty.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Response to the Letter to the Editor regarding "The effect of romosozumab on bone mineral density depending on prior treatment: a prospective, multicentre cohort study in Switzerland" by Yang and colleagues.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Rebecca J MoonMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2334-2284
Jean-Yves ReginsterWHO Collaborating Center for Epidemiology of Musculoskeletal Health and Ageing, Liège, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6290-752X
Nasser M Al-DaghriBiochemistry Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5472-1725
Jotheeswaran A ThiyagarajanAgeing and Health Unit, World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland.
Charlotte BeaudartWHO Collaborating Center for Epidemiology of Musculoskeletal Health and Ageing, Liège, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0827-5303
Olivier BruyèreWHO Collaborating Center for Epidemiology of Musculoskeletal Health and Ageing, Liège, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4269-9393
Nansa BurletDivision of Epidemiology, Public Health and Health Economics, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Manju ChandranOsteoporosis and Bone Metabolism Unit, Department of Endocrinology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Mario Coelho da SilvaLaboratory of Clinical and Therapeutical Pharmacology, Lisbon, Portugal.
Philip G ConaghanLeeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3478-5665
Willard H DereDepartment of Internal Medicine, Utah Center for Clinical and Translational Science, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9620-6940
Adolfo Diez-PerezDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, Autonomous University of Barcelona and CIBERFES, Instituto Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain.
Peyman HadjiFrankfurt Centre for Bone Health, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4787-3151
Philippe HalboutInternational Osteoporosis Foundation, Nyon, Switzerland.
Mickaël HiligsmannDepartment of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4274-9258
John A KanisMary McKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3129-4326
Eugene V McCloskeyMRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Integrated Research in Musculoskeletal Ageing, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0177-8140
Sif OrmarsdottirIcelandic Medicines Agency, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Daniel Prieto-AlhambraPharmaco- and Device Epidemiology, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences (NDORMS), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Régis P RadermeckerDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Diabetes, Nutrition and Metabolic Disorders, CHU Liege, Liege, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2866-8171
René RizzoliGeneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1537-422X
Yousef Al-SalehCollege of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5875-0950
Stuart L SilvermanCedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA.
Lee S SimonSDG LLC, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5673-807X
Friederike ThomasiusFrankfurt Centre for Bone Health, Frankfurt, Germany.
Tjeerd van StaaCentre for Health Informatics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9363-742X
Andrea LaslopScientific Office, Austrian Medicines and Medical Devices Agency, Vienna, Austria.
Cyrus CooperMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3510-0709
Nicholas C HarveyMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK. nch@mrc.soton.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8194-2512

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_21003Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1015Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/2Medical Research Council MR/P020941/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This narrative review summarises the recommendations of a Working Group of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO) for the conduct and reporting of real-world evidence studies with a focus on osteoporosis research. PURPOSE: Vast amounts of data are routinely generated at every healthcare contact and activity, and there is increasing recognition that these real-world data can be analysed to generate scientific evidence. Real-world evidence (RWE) is increasingly used to delineate the natural history of disease, assess real-life drug effectiveness, understand adverse events and in health economic analysis. The aim of this work was to understand the benefits and limitations of this type of data and outline approaches to ensure that transparent and high-quality evidence is generated.

methodsA ESCEO Working Group was convened in December 2022 to discuss the applicability of RWE to osteoporosis research and approaches to best practice.

resultsThis narrative review summarises the agreed recommendations for the conduct and reporting of RWE studies with a focus on osteoporosis research.

conclusionsIt is imperative that research using real-world data is conducted to the highest standards with close attention to limitations and biases of these data, and with transparency at all stages of study design, data acquisition and curation, analysis and reporting to increase the trustworthiness of RWE study findings.

Indexed as

Musculoskeletal DiseasesOsteoarthritisOsteoporosisHumansSocieties, MedicalDrug effectivenessEpidemiologyFractureOsteoporosisReal-world evidenceRegistry

Identifiers

PMID37351614
PMCPMC10382414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.