Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37351491›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2023

The genome of the reef-building glass sponge

Warren R Francis, Michael Eitel, Sergio Vargas, Catalina A Garcia-Escudero, Nicola Conci, Fabian Deister, Jasmine L Mah, Nadège Guiglielmoni, Stefan Krebs, Helmut Blum and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Co-option of Lysosomal Machinery for Sponge Biosilicification.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Silactins and Structural Diversity of Biosilica in Sponges.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The importance of integration.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Warren R FrancisDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Paleontology and Geobiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3473-4726
Michael EitelDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Paleontology and Geobiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0531-0732
Sergio VargasDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Paleontology and Geobiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8704-1339
Catalina A Garcia-EscuderoDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Paleontology and Geobiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9704-7865
Nicola ConciDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Paleontology and Geobiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5549-3197
Fabian DeisterDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Paleontology and Geobiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3172-3223
Jasmine L MahDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada T6G 2E9.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3044-4131
Nadège GuiglielmoniService Evolution Biologique et Ecologie, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1050 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6185-1592
Stefan KrebsLaboratory for Functional Genome Analysis (LAFUGA), Gene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5112-9507
Helmut BlumLaboratory for Functional Genome Analysis (LAFUGA), Gene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3994-2332
Sally P LeysDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada T6G 2E9.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9268-2181
Gert WörheideDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Paleontology and Geobiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6380-7421
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversity of Alberta · CABayerische Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Geologie · DEUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Well-annotated and contiguous genomes are an indispensable resource for understanding the evolution, development, and metabolic capacities of organisms. Sponges, an ecologically important non-bilaterian group of primarily filter-feeding sessile aquatic organisms, are underrepresented with respect to available genomic resources. Here we provide a high-quality and well-annotated genome of

Indexed as

differentially expressed genesgenomeHexactinellidaPoriferasilicasponge

Identifiers

PMID37351491
PMCPMC10282587
OpenAlexW4381512310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.