Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37351371›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2023

Barriers, facilitators and motivators of electronic community health information system use among health workers in Ethiopia.

Tariku Nigatu Bogale, Selamawit Meressa Teklehaimanot, Tilahun Fufa Debela, Daniel Berhanie Enyew, Abebe Nigusse Bedada, Segni Dufera Kebebew, Adane Nigusie Weldeab, Dawit Wolde Daka, Herman Jozef Willems, Tadesse Alemu Bekele

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tariku Nigatu BogaleJohn Snow, Inc. (JSI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Selamawit Meressa TeklehaimanotJohn Snow, Inc. (JSI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Tilahun Fufa DebelaDepartment of Health Service Management, School of Public Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Daniel Berhanie EnyewDepartment of Health Informatics, School of Public Health, Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia.
Abebe Nigusse BedadaJohn Snow, Inc. (JSI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Segni Dufera KebebewMinstry of Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Adane Nigusie WeldeabDepartment of Health Promotion & Health Behavior, Institute of Public Health, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Dawit Wolde DakaDepartment of Health Service Management, School of Public Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Herman Jozef WillemsJohn Snow, Inc. (JSI), Boston, MA, United States.
Tadesse Alemu BekeleJohn Snow, Inc. (JSI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The electronic community health information system (eCHIS) has been implemented in Ethiopia to support health services delivered by community health workers. Despite the many benefits of digitizing community health information systems, the implementation of the eCHIS is challenged by many barriers resulting in low uptake. This study assessed the barriers, facilitators, and motivators of eCHIS use among health workers with focus on health extension workers (HEWs) in Ethiopia. Methods: Phenomenological approach was used to assess the barriers, facilitators and motivators of eCHIS use in Amhara, Harari, Oromia, Sidama, South West Ethiopia and Southern Nation Nationalities and People's regions of Ethiopia. Data were collected from 15-29 May 2022. A total of 54 face-to-face in-depth interviews were conducted among HEWs, HEW supervisors, health information technicians and managers. The interviews were audiotaped using Open Data Kit, transcribed verbatim and translated into English. OpenCode 4.03 software was used for coding and categorizing the data. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. Results: The HEWs and other eCHIS users reported lack of infrastructure and resources; poor quality of training, follow-up, and supervision; parallel recording using the manual and electronic system; and HEWs' workload as barriers hindering eCHIS use. Data quality, retrievability, and traceability; tablet portability; encouragement from supervisors; and positive image in the community resulting from HEWs using tablets in their routine activities were the main facilitators of eCHIS use. Conclusion: The study identified various barriers that adversely affect the use of eCHIS. An integrated and coordinated approach to eCHIS implementation that encompasses removing the barriers, and reinforcing facilitators is required.

Indexed as

barrierselectronic community health information systemfacilitatorshealth workersmotivators

Identifiers

PMID37351371
PMCPMC10282640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.