Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37351338›Full record

ReviewCancer management and research2023

Optimal Delivery of Follow-Up Care Following Treatment for Adults Treated for Ewing Sarcoma.

Antonia Digklia, Ana Dolcan, Monika A Kucharczyk, Robin L Jones, Andrea Napolitano

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer management and research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Antonia DigkliaDepartment of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, 1011, Switzerland.
Ana DolcanDepartment of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, 1011, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7364-6908
Monika A KucharczykClinical Practice Research Datalink, MHRA, London, E14 4PU, UK.
Robin L JonesSarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4173-3844
Andrea NapolitanoSarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Lausanne · CHClinical Practice Research Datalink · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ewing sarcoma (ES) is a rare, highly malignant sarcoma. It usually presents in the second decade of life; however, patients can be diagnosed as early as newborns and as late as in their seventies. ES is most frequently found in the long bones of the extremities and the pelvis. In older patients, ES can also arise in the soft tissues. Currently, there is no standard schedule for surveillance of adult patients with ES after their initial treatment for localised disease, not only for the early detection of recurrence but also for long-term side effects. Follow-up is based on group recommendations using extrapolated data obtained primarily from studies with paediatric patients. The main objective of this review is to summarise the data available on treatment-associated complications in long-term survivors. Furthermore, we provide a set of recommendations for optimising the follow-up of adults ES survivors, as well as for managing the sequelae that result from intensive multimodal treatment.

Indexed as

Ewingfollow-upreviewsarcomasurvivortoxicities

Identifiers

PMID37351338
PMCPMC10284160
OpenAlexW4380987935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.