ArticleCardiovascular digital health journal2023
Diagnostic accuracy of the PMcardio smartphone application for artificial intelligence-based interpretation of electrocardiograms in primary care (AMSTELHEART-1).
Article in Cardiovascular digital health journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Opportunities, challenges, and requirements for Artificial Intelligence (AI) implementation in Primary Health Care (PHC): a systematic review.BMC primary care · 2025Pooled it
- PMcardio-Assisted ECG Interpretation in Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- The Digital Evolution of the Medical Black Bag: Environmental Scan With Trend Analysis and Horizon Scanning.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Knowledge level of ECG interpretation on STEMI, its equivalents and mimics among emergency department medical officers: a single-centre study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- AI-Enhanced Electrocardiogram for Detection of Occlusive Myocardial Infarction in High-Risk Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Detecting Occlusion Myocardial Infarction with an AI-Powered ECG Model: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- AI and Primary Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- The LEADING guideline: Reporting standards for expert panel, best-estimate diagnosis, and longitudinal expert all data (LEAD) methods.Comprehensive psychiatry · 2025Article
- Article
- Adequately identifying low-risk chest pain in emergency primary care: evaluating the performance of preHEAR(T) based on two European cohorts.Open heart · 2025Article
- Clinically meaningful interpretability of an AI model for ECG classification.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- The LEADING Guideline: Reporting Standards for Expert Panel, Best-Estimate Diagnosis, and Longitudinal Expert All Data (LEAD) Studies.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Article
- Artificial intelligence in primary health care: A bibliometric analysis of publications from 2015 to 2024.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The use of 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is common in routine primary care, however it can be difficult for less experienced ECG readers to adequately interpret the ECG. Objective: To validate a smartphone application (PMcardio) as a stand-alone interpretation tool for 12-lead ECG in primary care. Methods: We recruited consecutive patients who underwent 12-lead ECG as part of routinely indicated primary care in the Netherlands. All ECGs were assessed by the PMcardio app, which analyzes a photographed image of 12-lead ECG for automated interpretation, installed on an Android platform (Samsung Galaxy M31) and an iOS platform (iPhone SE2020). We validated the PMcardio app for detecting any major ECG abnormality (MEA, primary outcome), defined as atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF), markers of (past) myocardial ischemia, or clinically relevant impulse and/or conduction abnormalities; or AF (key secondary outcome) with a blinded expert panel as reference standard. Results: We included 290 patients from 11 Dutch general practices with median age 67 (interquartile range 55-74) years; 48% were female. On reference ECG, 71 patients (25%) had MEA and 35 (12%) had AF. Sensitivity and specificity of PMcardio for MEA were 86% (95% CI: 76%-93%) and 92% (95% CI: 87%-95%), respectively. For AF, sensitivity and specificity were 97% (95% CI: 85%-100%) and 99% (95% CI: 97%-100%), respectively. Performance was comparable between Android and iOS platform (kappa = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.91-0.99 and kappa = 1.00, 95% CI: 1.00-1.00 for MEA and AF, respectively). Conclusion: A smartphone app developed to interpret 12-lead ECGs was found to have good diagnostic accuracy in a primary care setting for major ECG abnormalities, and near-perfect properties for diagnosing AF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.