Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37351327›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in surgery2023

Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and durability.

Carlo Ronsini, Francesca Pasanisi, Stefano Cianci, Maria Giovanna Vastarella, Marika Pennacchio, Marco Torella, Alfredo Ercoli, Nicola Colacurci

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Carlo RonsiniDepartment of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli," Naples, Italy.
Francesca PasanisiDepartment of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli," Naples, Italy.
Stefano CianciObstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Department of Human Pathology of Adult and Childhood "G. Baresi," University Hospital "G. Martino", Messina, Italy.
Maria Giovanna VastarellaDepartment of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli," Naples, Italy.
Marika PennacchioDepartment of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli," Naples, Italy.
Marco TorellaDepartment of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli," Naples, Italy.
Alfredo ErcoliObstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Department of Human Pathology of Adult and Childhood "G. Baresi," University Hospital "G. Martino", Messina, Italy.
Nicola ColacurciDepartment of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli," Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a widespread condition affecting from 40% to 60% of women. Reconstructive vaginal surgeries are the most commonly performed procedures to treat POP. Among those, uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS), which is usually performed transvaginally, preserves pelvic statics and dynamics and appears to be an effective method. Laparoscopic USLS is a valid alternative to vaginal approach, and the aim of our review is to confirm its safety and feasibility and to compare clinical outcomes among the procedures. Materials and methods: Following the recommendations in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, we systematically searched the PubMed and Scopus databases in December 2022. We made no restriction on the publication year nor on the country. Data about POP-Q recurrence rate (RR), intraoperative and postoperative complications (graded according to Clavien-Dindo classification), readmission rate, and reoperation rate were collected and analyzed. We used comparative studies for meta-analysis. Results: A total of nine studies fulfilled inclusion criteria: two articles were non-comparative retrospective observational studies, three more articles were comparative studies where laparoscopic USLS was confronted with other surgical techniques (only data of laparoscopic USLS were analyzed), and four were comparative retrospective cohort studies between laparoscopic and vaginal USLS procedures. The comparative studies were enrolled in meta-analysis. Patients were analyzed concerning perioperative risks and the risk of recurrence. The meta-analysis highlighted that there was no clear inferiority of one technique over the other. Discussion: Laparoscopic USLS is a technique with a low complication rate and low recurrence rate. Indeed, laparoscopic procedure allows better identification of anatomical landmarks and access to retroperitoneum. Moreover, efficacy over time and durability of Laparoscopic (LPS) USLS was also observed. However, these data should be weighed in light of the length of follow-up, which was in a very short range. Further, focused and prospective studies will be necessary to confirm this finding.

Indexed as

laparoscopymini-invasive surgery (MIS)minimally invasive surgerysafetyuterosacral ligament suspensionvaginal

Identifiers

PMID37351327
PMCPMC10282652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.