ArticleArchivos peruanos de cardiologia y cirugia cardiovascular
[One-year survival among patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction in Peru].
Article in Archivos peruanos de cardiologia y cirugia cardiovascular. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Clinical variables associated with no-reflow after percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Secondary analysis of the PERSTEMI I and II study].Archivos peruanos de cardiologia y cirugia cardiovascularArticle
- [Trends in the epidemiology of acute myocardial infarction in Peru: An analysis of the official SUSALUD records].Archivos peruanos de cardiologia y cirugia cardiovascularArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To determine one-year survival and factors associated with mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in Peru. Methods: An analysis was made of the cohort of patients included in the PERSTEMI-II registry during the year 2020, in whom survival at one year after the event and its risk factors were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression. Results: Of 374 patients in the PERSTEMI-II study, 366 (97.9%) completed follow-up up to one year after the event with a survival rate of 85%. Successful reperfusion was related to better survival at 1 year (hazard ratio [HR]=0.30, 95% CI: 0.14-0.62, p=0.001). Age (HR=1.04, 95% CI: 1.01-1.07, p=0.003), chronic kidney disease (HR=2.15, 95% CI: 1.04-4.39, p=0.037) and cardiogenic shock (HR=6.67, 95% CI: 3.72-11.97, p<0.001) were factors of higher mortality at 1-year follow-up. Conclusion: The PERSTEMI-II registry is the first Peruvian registry that provides data on survival after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, which is 85% at one year. Successful reperfusion improves survival at one-year post infarction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.