ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023
The diagnostic value of electrocardiogram-based machine learning in long QT syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Image-based AI diagnostic performance for fatty liver: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical imaging · 2023Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence in the Assessment of Heart Rate Variability as an Instrument to Understand the Connection Between Psychologic and Psychiatric Conditions and the Heart.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Sports Cardiology: Advancing Cardiovascular Screening and Diagnosis.Cureus · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: To perform a meta-analysis to discover the performance of ML algorithms in identifying Congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS). Methods: The searched databases included Cochrane, EMBASE, Web of Science, and PubMed. Our study considered all English-language studies that reported the detection of LQTS using ML algorithms. Quality was assessed using QUADAS-2 and QUADAS-AI tools. The bivariate mixed effects models were used in our study. Based on genotype data for LQTS, we performed a subgroup analysis. Results: Out of 536 studies, 8 met all inclusion criteria. The pooled area under the receiving operating curve (SAUROC) for detecting LQTS was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.31-1.00); sensitivity was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.83-0.90), and specificity was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88-0.93). Additionally, diagnostic odd ratio (DOR) was 65 (95% CI: 39-109). The positive likelihood ratio (PLR) was 9.3 (95% CI: 7.0-12.3) and the negative likelihood ratio (NLR) was 0.14 (95% CI: 0.11-0.20), with very low heterogeneity ( Discussion: We found that machine learning can be used to detect features of rare cardiovascular disease like LQTS, thus increasing our understanding of intelligent interpretation of ECG. To improve ML performance in the classification of LQTS subtypes, further research is required. Systematic Review Registration: identifier PROSPERO CRD42022360122.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.