ArticleHepatobiliary surgery and nutrition2023
Impact of pure laparoscopic surgery on bile duct division of living donor left lateral section procurement.
Article in Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dexmedetomidine Cannot Attenuate Liver Injury and Improve Outcomes Following Laparoscopic Living Donor Hepatectomy: A Randomised Controlled Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Trial
- Chinese guidelines for minimally invasive donor hepatectomy in living donor liver transplantation (2024 edition).Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2024Review
- The application of real-time indocyanine green fluorescence cholangiography in laparoscopic living donor left lateral sectionectomy.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2024Article
- Checklists, risk of bias tools, and reporting guidelines for research in orthopedics, sports medicine, and rehabilitation.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although laparoscopic living donor left lateral section liver procurements represents an established and safe procedure, there remains much discussion on this topic. In particular, the issue of whether laparoscopic living donor liver procurement increases the difficulty of the surgery and potential complications for recipients continue to confound experts in this field. Methods: In this report, data from 180 cases of living donor left lateral section liver transplantation patients were analyzed retrospectively. Of these 180 cases, 106 grafts were procured by open surgery and 74 by pure laparoscopic surgery. Results: While surgery durations and blood loss were decreased in donors from the laparoscopic surgery group, increased biliary openings of grafts and relatively high peak aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels were present in both donors and recipients with this procedure. Conclusions: Laparoscopic living donor left lateral section liver procurement represents a safe and effective procedure for both donors and recipients. However, laparoscopic surgery can more frequently lead to multiple biliary tracts in the graft and its impact on the prognosis of recipients remains uncertain. Use of routine X-ray based intraoperative cholangiography may help to reduce this problem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.