Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37351131›Full record

ArticleHepatobiliary surgery and nutrition2023

Association of tumor morphology with long-term prognosis after liver resection for patients with a solitary huge hepatocellular carcinoma-a multicenter propensity score matching analysis.

Xin-Fei Xu, Han Wu, Ju-Dong Li, Lan-Qing Yao, Bin Huang, Yong-Kang Diao, Ting-Hao Chen, Wei-Min Gu, Zhong Chen, Jie Li and 11 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 12 institutions in 2 countries.

Xin-Fei Xu *Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, China.
Han Wu *Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, China.
Ju-Dong Li *Department of General Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, China.
Lan-Qing Yao *Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, China.
Bin HuangDepartment of Radiology, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, China.
Yong-Kang DiaoDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Cancer Center, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China.
Ting-Hao ChenDepartment of General Surgery, Ziyang First People's Hospital, Ziyang, China.
Wei-Min GuThe First Department of General Surgery, the Fourth Hospital of Harbin, Harbin, China.
Zhong ChenDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Jie LiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fuyang People's Hospital, Fuyang, China.
Yao-Ming ZhangThe Second Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Meizhou People's Hospital, Meizhou, China.
Hong WangDepartment of General Surgery, Liuyang People's Hospital, Changsha, China.
Ying-Jian LiangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Ya-Hao ZhouDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Pu'er People's Hospital, Pu'er, China.
Chao LiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, China.
Ming-Da WangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, China.
Cheng-Wu ZhangDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Cancer Center, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China.
Timothy M PawlikDepartment of Surgery, Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Wan Yee LauDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, China.
Feng ShenDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, China.
Tian YangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, China.
Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital · CNSecond Military Medical University · CNHarbin Medical University · CNZhejiang Provincial People's Hospital · CNAffiliated Hospital of Nantong University · CNFuyang City People's Hospital · CNHangzhou Medical College · CNLiuyang City Maternal and Child Health Hospital · CNMeizhou City People's Hospital · CNPuer University · CNThe First People's Hospital of Guiyang · CNThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) without macrovascular invasion and distant metastasis, regardless of tumor size, is currently classified as early-stage disease by the latest Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system. While the preferred treatment is surgical resection, the association of tumor morphology with long-term survival outcomes after liver resection for a solitary huge HCC of ≥10 cm has not been defined. Methods: Patients who underwent curative liver resection for a solitary huge HCC were identified from a multicenter database. Preoperative imaging findings were used to define spherical- or ellipsoidal-shaped lesions with smooth edges as balloon-shaped HCCs (BS-HCCs); out-of-shape lesions or lesions of any shape with matt edges were defined as non-balloon-shaped HCCs (NBS-HCCs). The two groups of patients with BS-HCCs and NBS-HCCs were matched in a 1:1 ratio using propensity score matching (PSM). Clinicopathologic characteristics, long-term overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were assessed. Results: Among patients with a solitary huge HCC, 74 pairs of patients with BS-HCC and NBS-HCC were matched. Tumor pathological features including proportions of microvascular invasion, satellite nodules, and incomplete tumor encapsulation in the BS-HCC group were lower than the NBS-HCC group. At a median follow-up of 50.7 months, median OS and RFS of all patients with a solitary huge HCC after PSM were 27.8 and 10.1 months, respectively. The BS-HCC group had better median OS and RFS than the NBS-HCC group (31.9 Conclusions: For a solitary huge HCC, preoperative imaging on tumor morphology was associated with prognosis following resection. In particular, patients with BS-HCCs had better long-term survival following liver resection versus patients with large NBS-HCCs.

Indexed as

hepatectomyHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)recurrencesurvivaltumor morphology

Identifiers

PMID37351131
PMCPMC10282672
OpenAlexW4213061043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.