Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37351087›Full record

ReviewJB & JS open access

Racial and Sex Disparities in Resident Attrition in Orthopaedic Surgery.

Lee S Haruno, Xi Chen, Melodie Metzger, Carol A Lin, Milton T M Little, Linda E A Kanim, Selina C Poon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Seen and Heard: Gender Identity and Concordance Shapes Caregiver Experiences in Pediatric Orthopaedics.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2026
    Article
  3. Sex, Racial, and Ethnic Diversity of US Musculoskeletal Oncology Fellows, a 10-year Analysis.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lee S HarunoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5767-4263
Xi ChenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3855-2591
Melodie MetzgerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8892-7035
Carol A LinDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3633-323X
Milton T M LittleDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4317-6378
Linda E A KanimDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9008-8103
Selina C PoonShriners Children's Southern California, Pasadena, California.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6428-1663

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies have suggested that female individuals and individuals from backgrounds under-represented in medicine (URiM) are at increased risk of attrition during residency. This likely exacerbates the lack of diversity in our field. The aims of this study were to (1) characterize demographic composition in orthopaedic residency from 2001 to 2018 and (2) determine the race/ethnicity and identify any disparities. Methods: Demographic and attrition data from 2001 to 2018 were obtained from the Association of American Medical Colleges. Attrition data comprised the following categories: withdrawals, dismissals, and transfers to another specialty. Analysis compared demographic composition and determined attrition rates with subgroup analysis by race/ethnicity and sex. Results: From 2001 to 2018, female orthopaedic residents increased from 8.77% to 15.54% and URiM residents from 9.49% to 11.32%. The overall and unintended attrition rates in orthopaedic surgery were 3.20% and 1.15%, respectively. Among female residents, the overall and unintended attrition rates were 5.96% and 2.09% compared with 2.79% and 1.01%, respectively, in male residents. URiM residents had overall and unintended attrition rates of 6.16% and 3.11% compared with 2.71% and 0.83%, respectively, for their White counterparts. Black/African American residents had an attrition rate of nearly 10%. Female residents averaged 12.9% of all residents but 24% of those leaving orthopaedics. URiM residents were 10.14% of all residents but 19.51% of those experiencing attrition. In logistic regression models, female residents had a relative risk (RR) of 2.20 (p < 0.001) for experiencing all-cause attrition and 2.09 (p < 0.001) for unintended attrition compared with male residents. Compared with their White male counterparts, URiM residents had a RR for overall and unintended attrition of 2.36 and 3.84 (p < 0.001), respectively; Black/African American residents had a RR for the same of 3.80 and 7.20 (p < 0.001), respectively. Conclusion: Although female resident percentage has increased, orthopaedics continues to train fewer female surgeons than all other fields. Female and URiM residents in orthopaedic surgery are disproportionately affected by attrition. While recruitment has been the primary focus of diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts, this study suggests that resident retention through appropriately supporting residents during training is equally critical.

Identifiers

PMID37351087
PMCPMC10284323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.