SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2023
Emerging trends on the mechanism of pelvic organ prolapse from 1997 to 2022: visualization and bibliometric analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Top 100 most-cited articles on pelvic organ prolapse: a visualization and bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Risk factors for endometrial polyps to transform into endometrial cancer: insights from a bibliometric analysis.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2025Review
- Global Trends and Emerging Frontiers on Ovarian Endometriosis: A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Review
- Bibliometric Analyses of the Research Trends of Female Pelvic Organ Prolapse.International urogynecology journal · 2024Article
- A bibliometric analysis of literatures on uterine leiomyosarcoma in the last 20 years.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: At present, there is no feature description of the mechanism of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in the literature. This study aimed to map the emerging trends regarding the mechanism of POP from inception to 2022 by bibliometric analysis and to analyze its research hotspots and frontiers. Methods: We downloaded pertinent publications from inception to 2022 from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) on 30 June 2022. The data were then examined using the Bibliometrix program in R (Version 4.1.0), CiteSpace software, the Online Analysis Platform of Literature Metrology (https://bibliometric.com), and a bibliometrix online interface. Results: A total of 290 qualified records on the mechanism of POP were identified and included in the analysis. The most productive journal was International Urogynecology Journal. Bump RC and Olsen AL were the most cited authors. Extracellular matrix, collagen, apoptosis, elastin, oxidative stress, gene expression, matrix metalloproteinase, and tissue engineering were among the 25 most relevant terms. According to the analysis of trending topics, tissue engineering has become a new research hotspot. Conclusion: Extracellular matrix remodeling, oxidative stress and apoptosis are the three main directions for studying the mechanism of POP. In addition, tissue engineering has become a new research hotspot. In the future, in-depth research on the interaction between different mechanisms will be carried out, and attempts will be made to combine biomimetic materials and seed cells to achieve the regeneration and reconstruction of POP-related organs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.