Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37351002›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2023

Psychiatric consequences and issues of long COVID on patients with prior psychiatric comorbidities: a scoping review.

Francesca Hovagemyan, Adeline Dugerdil, Axelle Braggion, Luc Mallet, Antoine Flahault

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Francesca HovagemyanInstitute of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Adeline DugerdilInstitute of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Axelle BraggionInstitute of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Luc MalletInstitute of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Antoine FlahaultInstitute of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
University of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 is a growing field of research and mental health in long COVID is one of its interesting domains. This scoping review aims at studying the outcomes of mental health in patients already known for psychiatric illness. This was done by researching the literature in two databases (Embase and PubMed) for articles studying mental health consequences of long COVID in patients already known for psychiatric history. Eleven studies were included. 6/11 studies found an effect of long COVID, with varying severity of outcomes studied, with either a worsening in length or severity. 4/11 did not find any correlation between worsening symptoms and psychiatric history. The methods for assessing which psychiatric symptoms to include and how to determine prior history were heterogeneous, making direct comparison sometimes difficult. The data seem to show worse effects of long COVID on mental health of patients with prior mental illness, with limitations regarding the heterogeneity of the studies' designs and focuses. It also highlights how neglected this population of patients is in the current state of research.

Indexed as

long COVIDmental healthpsychiatric historypsychiatric symptomsSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID37351002
PMCPMC10282140
OpenAlexW4379793512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.