ArticleNeurotrauma reports2023
Sleep Disturbance and Severe Hydrocephalus in a Normally Behaving Wistar Rat With Traumatic Brain Injury.
Article in Neurotrauma reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report on a case study of a Wistar rat that was investigated in detail because it exhibited no N3 sleep in electroencephalography (EEG) after lateral fluid-percussion injury (FPI)-induced traumatic brain injury (TBI). The rat (#112) belonged to a cohort of 28 adult Wistar rats exposed to lateral FPI. Rats were monitored by continuous video EEG for 30 days to follow-up on the evolution of sleep disturbances. The beam walking test was used to measure post-TBI functional recovery. Severity of the cortical lesion area, total brain volume, and cortical volume were measured from histological brain sections. Rat #112 had a normal body and skull appearance. Its baseline body weight did not differ from that of the rest of the cohort. At baseline, rat #112 crossed the beam in 6.3 sec (score range for the rest of the cohort, 4.7-44.3) and showed no evident slipping of the paws, scoring a 5.3 (score range for the rest of cohort, 4.3-6.0). On day 30 post-TBI, however, rat #112 was the only rat with a score of 0 on the beam. Histological analysis at 30 days post-TBI revealed a small 0.6-mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.