Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37350728›Full record

ReviewBalkan medical journal2023

Current Status and Surgical Technique for Restorative Proctocolectomy with Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis

Melik Kağan Aktaş, Mehmet Gülmez, Ahmet Anıl Sahar, Can Saraçoğlu, Eren Esen, Erman Aytaç, Feza H Remzi

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Balkan medical journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Melik Kağan AktaşDepartment of General Surgery, Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University, Atakent Hospital, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-0107-543X
Mehmet GülmezInflammatory Bowel Disease Center, NYU Langone Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, USAORCID 0000-0001-8803-6160
Ahmet Anıl SaharDepartment of General Surgery, Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University, Atakent Hospital, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0009-0006-1598-020X
Can SaraçoğluDepartment of General Surgery, Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University, Atakent Hospital, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-8047-1296
Eren EsenInflammatory Bowel Disease Center, NYU Langone Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, USAORCID 0000-0002-4905-7142
Erman AytaçDepartment of General Surgery, Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University, Atakent Hospital, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-8803-0874
Feza H RemziInflammatory Bowel Disease Center, NYU Langone Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, USAORCID 0000-0003-3465-9324
Acıbadem University Atakent Hospital · TRNYU Langone Health · USKent Hastanesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (RP/IPAA) is the procedure of choice for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), some patients with colonic Crohn’s disease (CD), and those with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP); albeit, owing to its complexity, it should be performed by experienced professionals. RP/IPAA is the recommended surgical treatment for UC when the standard medical therapy is ineffective. This procedure has been demonstrated to provide patients with a good quality of life, such as in FAP patients with extensive disease in the rectum. The CD has been associated with higher rates of perianal involvement and disease recurrence, but some patients with CD limited to the large intestine and minimal perianal or ileal disease may also be considered for this operation. First, all patients undergo a detailed preoperative evaluation that includes a review of previous imaging, pathology, and colonoscopy findings, a perianal examination, an evaluation of the anorectal functions, mechanical bowel preparation, and prophylaxis against deep venous thrombosis and infectious complications. A staged approach is the most commonly preferred technique for RP/IPAA, which can be performed in 2 or 3 stages. The IPAA can be performed by laparoscopic, robotic, or open approach. The type of approach is determined based on the patient’s condition, medication used, elective or emergency setting, and the surgeon’s expertise level. A successful IPAA requires tension-free pouch anastomosis. The most common IPAA pouch types are the J or S pouches; alternatively, an H pouch may be created, which is mainly used in redo pouches. In experienced centers, > 95% of the patients become stoma-free in 10 years. IPAA is a complex procedure, and the complications after pouch surgery are pouchitis, pelvic sepsis, pouch failure, or anastomotic stricture. The majority of long-term complications can be prevented in such cases with a comprehensive preoperative evaluation and through the use of appropriate surgical techniques and postoperative care conducted at experienced centers. The techniques for performing RP/IPAA with their long-term outcomes have been reviewed in this article.

Indexed as

Adenomatous Polyposis ColiColitis, UlcerativePouchitisProctocolectomy, RestorativeAnastomosis, SurgicalHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID37350728
PMCPMC10339847
OpenAlexW4381715540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.