ArticleEuropean stroke journal2023
Prediction of response to thrombolysis in acute stroke using neural network analysis of CT perfusion imaging.
Article in European stroke journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep Learning Applications in Imaging of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Narrative Summary.Radiology · 2025Pooled it
- Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Prognostic Prediction Model and the Role of Ischemic Core Growth Rate.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Article
- Automatic prediction of stroke treatment outcomes: latest advances and perspectives.Biomedical engineering letters · 2025Review
- Systemic inflammation-based hematological indices and 90-day functional outcomes after intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence, machine learning, and reproducibility in stroke research.European stroke journal · 2024Article
- Assessment of Computed Tomography Perfusion Research Landscape: A Topic Modeling Study.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn ischaemic stroke patients undergoing reperfusion therapy, the amount of salvageable tissue, that is, extent of the ischaemic penumbra, predicts the clinical outcomes. CT perfusion (CTP) enables quantification of penumbral tissues to guide decision making, and current programmes have automated its analysis. More advanced machine learning techniques utilising the CTP maps may improve prediction beyond the ischaemic volume measures.
methodWe determined whether applying convolutional neural networks (CNN), a key machine learning technique in modelling image-label relationships, to post-processed CTP maps improved prediction of outcome, assessed by 3 months modified Rankin scale (mRS). Patients who underwent thrombolysis but not thrombectomy were included. CTP maps of a retrospective cohort of 230 patients with middle cerebral artery stroke were used to develop the model, which was validated in an independent cohort of 129 patients.
resultsWe constructed a CNN model that predicted a favourable post-thrombolysis outcome (mRS 0-2 at 3 months) with an area under receiver-operator characteristics curve (AUC) of 0.792 (95% CI, 0.707-0.877). This model outperformed a currently clinically used MISTAR software using previously validated thresholds (AUC = 0.583, 95% CI, 0.480-0.686) and a model modified using thresholds from the derivation cohort (AUC = 0.670, 95% CI, 0.571-0.769). By combining CNN-derived features and baseline demographic features, the prediction AUC was improved to 0.865 (95% CI, 0.794-0.936).
conclusionCNN improved prediction of post-thrombolysis outcome, and may be useful in selecting which patients benefit from thrombolysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.