Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37350463›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology (Reading, England)2023

Using the

Evgenia Maslova, Shanga Osman, Ronan R McCarthy

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology (Reading, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Establishment ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Evgenia MaslovaDivision of Biosciences, Department of Life Sciences, Centre of Inflammation Research and Translational Medicine, College of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, College of Health and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK.
Shanga OsmanDivision of Biosciences, Department of Life Sciences, Centre of Inflammation Research and Translational Medicine, College of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, College of Health and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK.
Ronan R McCarthyDivision of Biosciences, Department of Life Sciences, Centre of Inflammation Research and Translational Medicine, College of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, College of Health and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK.
Brunel University of London · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/V007823/1British Heart FoundationWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Burn wound infection is the leading cause of mortality among burn wound patients. One of the most commonly isolated bacterial burn wound pathogens is

Indexed as

BurnsMothsProbioticsPseudomonas InfectionsWound InfectionAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsLactobacillusMammalsMicePseudomonas aeruginosaAnti-Bacterial Agentsburn infectionburn woundburn wound modelGalleria mellonellaLactobacillusprobioticPseudomonas aeruginosa

Identifiers

PMID37350463
PMCPMC10333784
OpenAlexW4381716893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.