Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37350424›Full record

ArticleBJPsych open2023

Acceptability of a Chinese version of volitional help sheet to prevent self-harm repetition: qualitative study.

I-Ting Hwang, Yi-Chun Chen, Christopher J Armitage, Chia-Yueh Hsu, Shu-Sen Chang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

I-Ting HwangDepartment of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2965-6009
Yi-Chun ChenInstitute of Health Behaviors and Community Sciences, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taiwan.
Christopher J ArmitageManchester Centre for Health Psychology, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, UK; Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, UK; and NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, University of Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2365-1765
Chia-Yueh HsuDepartment of Psychiatry, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taiwan; Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taiwan; and Psychiatric Research Center, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taiwan.
Shu-Sen ChangInstitute of Health Behaviors and Community Sciences, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taiwan; Psychiatric Research Center, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taiwan; Global Health Program, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taiwan; and Population Health Research Center, National Taiwan University, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5012-1132

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST 109-2314-B-002-144-MY3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividuals who self-harm have increased suicide rates. Brief interventions are associated with reduced repeated suicide attempts. However, very few previous studies investigated the acceptability of brief interventions before implementing new trials.

aimsWe aimed to explore the perceptions of individuals who self-harm toward a brief intervention, the Chinese version of the volitional help sheet (VHS-C), which encourages people to link a critical situation with an appropriate response.

methodFourteen participants who presented to hospitals with self-harm were interviewed about their perspectives regarding the acceptability of the paper- and web-based VHS-C. Data were analysed with the framework method.

resultsThe participants could understand the intended goal of the VHS-C by reading the written instructions, but indicated that having verbal instructions would also help. They shared the reasons why they felt the VHS-C was helpful (e.g. relatable contents, useful coping strategies and appropriate instructions that made them feel understood) or unhelpful (e.g., being not specific enough, not useful during the crisis and triggering negative emotional responses). Some indicated that the VHS-C might not be applicable to people experiencing ongoing distress in emergency departments. Most participants preferred the web-based to the paper-based VHS-C, and suggested that the format and frequency of follow-up reminders could leave the patient to decide.

conclusionsThe contents of the VHS-C were acceptable for people who presented to hospitals with self-harm. The VHS-C may be more helpful before individuals encounter suicidal thoughts than when they have an ongoing crisis.

Indexed as

acceptabilityBrief interventionpatient perspectiveself-harmsuicide

Identifiers

PMID37350424
PMCPMC10304852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.