Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37350377›Full record

ReviewHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2023

#TreatmentResistantDepression: A qualitative content analysis of Tweets about difficult-to-treat depression.

Amelia Talbot, Tori Ford, Sara Ryan, Kamal R Mahtani, Charlotte Albury

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. #TreatmentResistantDepression: A qualitative content analysis of Tweets about difficult-to-treat depression.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amelia TalbotNuffield Department of Primary Health Care Sciences, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6892-5419
Tori FordNuffield Department of Primary Health Care Sciences, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Sara RyanDepartment of Social Care and Social Work, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7406-1610
Kamal R MahtaniNuffield Department of Primary Health Care Sciences, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Charlotte AlburyNuffield Department of Primary Health Care Sciences, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1036-6626

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTreatment-resistant depression (TRD) is depression unresponsive to antidepressants and affects 55% of British primary care users with depression. Current evidence is from secondary care, but long referral times mean general practitioners (GPs) manage TRD. Studies show that people with depression use Twitter to form community and document symptoms. However, Twitter remains a largely unexplored space of documented patient experience. Twitter data could provide valuable insights into learning about primary care experiences of TRD. In this study, we explored Twitter comments and conversations about TRD and produced patient-driven recommendations.

methodsTweets from UK-based users were collected manually and using a browser extension in June 2021. Conventional content analysis was used to provide an overview of the Tweets, followed by interpretation to understand why Twitter may be important to people with TRD.

resultsA total of 415 Tweets were organised into five clusters: self-diagnosis, symptoms, support, small wins and condition experts. These Tweets were interpreted as showing Twitter as a community for people with TRD. People had a collective sense of illness identity and were united in their experiences of TRD. However, users in the community also highlighted the absence of effective GP care, leading users to position themselves as condition experts. Users shared advice from a place of lived experience with the community but also shared potentially harmful information, including recommendations about nonevidence-based medications.

conclusionsFindings illuminate the benefits of the TRD Twitter community and also highlight that the perception of a lack of knowledge and support from GPs may lead community members to advise nonevidenced-based medications. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study was led by a person with lived experience of TRD and bipolar. Two public contributors with mental health conditions gave feedback on our study protocol and results.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersSocial MediaAntidepressive AgentsCommunicationDepressionHumansAntidepressive Agentsantidepressantscommunitydepressionqualitative researchtreatment resistanceTwitter

Identifiers

PMID37350377
PMCPMC10485331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.