Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37350298›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2023

Trajectory of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy post-vaccination and public's intention to take booster vaccines: A cross-sectional analysis.

Muhammad Salman, Tauqeer Hussain Mallhi, Yusra Habib Khan, Zia Ul Mustafa, Muhammad Tanveer Khan, Faiz Ullah Khan, Muhammad Hammad Butt, Naureen Shehzadi, Muhammad Junaid Farrukh, Maria Waheed and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Muhammad SalmanInstitute of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical and Allied Health Sciences, Lahore College for Women University, Lahore, Pakistan.
Tauqeer Hussain MallhiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Jouf University, Sakaka, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Yusra Habib KhanDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Jouf University, Sakaka, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Zia Ul MustafaDepartment of Pharmacy Services, District Headquarter Hospital, Pakpattan, Pakistan.
Muhammad Tanveer KhanInstitute of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical and Allied Health Sciences, Lahore College for Women University, Lahore, Pakistan.
Faiz Ullah KhanDepartment of Pharmacy Administration and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Muhammad Hammad ButtDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4387-1351
Naureen ShehzadiPunjab University College of Pharmacy, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
Muhammad Junaid FarrukhFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, UCSI University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Maria WaheedFaculty of Pharmacy, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Fatima AzmatFaculty of Pharmacy, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Areej SaeedFaculty of Pharmacy, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Syeda Ayesha MazharFaculty of Pharmacy, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Asim AliFaculty of Pharmacy, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Aisha AshfaqFaculty of Pharmacy, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Khalid HussainPunjab University College of Pharmacy, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
University of Lahore · PKJouf University · SALahore College for Women University · PKUniversity of the Punjab · PKPakistan Army · PKUCSI University · MYUppsala University · SEXi'an Jiaotong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccine hesitancy (VH) is not a new phenomenon in Pakistan and is regarded as one of the primary causes of unsatisfactory vaccination campaigns. This study determined post-vaccination COVID-19 VH, factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine uptake, and public's intent to receive booster vaccinations. A cross-sectional study was conducted among adult population of Lahore, Pakistan. Participants were recruited via convenience sampling between March and May 2022. SPSS version 22 was used for the data analysis. A total of 650 participants were included in the study (age = 28.1 ± 9.7 years; male-to-female ratio nearly 1: 1). The majority of participants received Sinopharm followed by Sinovac vaccine. The top three reasons of vaccine uptake were "only vaccinated individuals are allowed at the workplace, and educational institutes" (Relative importance index (RII) = 0.749), "only vaccinated people are allowed to go to markets, malls and other public places" (RII = 0.746), and "protect myself from the infection" (RII = 0.742). The mean COVID-19 VH score was 24.5 ± 6.2 (95% CI 23.9-24.9), with not being pro-vaccines and poor economic status were the significant predictors of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among immunized individuals (

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesAdolescentAdultCOVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIntentionMaleVaccinationYoung AdultCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccinesbooster dosesCOVID-19Pakistanpandemicvaccine acceptancevaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID37350298
PMCPMC10332231
OpenAlexW4381715695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.