Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37349969›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2023

Dirichlet process mixture models for the analysis of repeated attempt designs.

Michael J Daniels, Minji Lee, Wei Feng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael J DanielsDepartment of Statistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9856-9486
Minji LeeEdwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California, USA.
Wei FengKeros Therapeutics, Lexington, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

Combining longitudinal cohort studies to examine cardiovascular risk factor trajectories across the adult lifespan and their association with diseaseR01HL158963 · NHLBI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI DANIELS, MICHAEL J, SIDDIQUE, JUNED · 2021 to 2024
$2.3M
Bayesian machine learning for complex missing data and causal inference with a focus on cardiovascular and obesity studiesR01HL166324 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI Michael J Daniels · 2023 to 2026
$2.1M
BAYESIAN APPROACHES FOR MISSINGNESS AND CAUSALITY IN CANCER AND BEHAVIOR STUDIESR01CA183854 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI DANIELS, MICHAEL J · 2014 to 2019
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS CA183854NCI NIH HHS R01 CA183854NHLBI NIH HHS HL158963NHLBI NIH HHS HL166324NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL158963NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL166324
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In longitudinal studies, it is not uncommon to make multiple attempts to collect a measurement after baseline. Recording whether these attempts are successful provides useful information for the purposes of assessing missing data assumptions. This is because measurements from subjects who provide the data after numerous failed attempts may differ from those who provide the measurement after fewer attempts. Previous models for these designs were parametric and/or did not allow sensitivity analysis. For the former, there are always concerns about model misspecification and for the latter, sensitivity analysis is essential when conducting inference in the presence of missing data. Here, we propose a new approach which minimizes issues with model misspecification by using Bayesian nonparametrics for the observed data distribution. We also introduce a novel approach for identification and sensitivity analysis. We re-analyze the repeated attempts data from a clinical trial involving patients with severe mental illness and conduct simulations to better understand the properties of our approach.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersModels, StatisticalBayes TheoremHumansLongitudinal Studiesbayesian nonparametricsinformative priorsmissing data

Identifiers

PMID37349969
PMCPMC11091717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.