Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37349825›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2023

Varicose Vein Education and Informed coNsent (VVEIN) study: a randomised controlled pilot feasibility study.

Aoife Kiernan, Fiona Boland, Daragh Moneley, Frank Doyle, Denis W Harkin

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05261412 (Varicose Vein Education and Informed coNsent), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 82% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05261412 nacompletednot on this map

Varicose Vein Education and Informed coNsent (VVEIN) Study: A Randomised Feasibility Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorRoyal College of Surgeons, IrelandRan2022 to 2023Enrolled40ConditionsVaricose VeinsArmsStandard Consent, Digital health education tool (dHET)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Aoife KiernanStrategic Academic Research (StAR) Programme, Royal College of Surgeons, Dublin, Ireland. aoifekiernan.ak@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0149-4527
Fiona BolandData Science Centre, School of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
Daragh MoneleyDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Bon Secours Health System, Dublin, Ireland.
Frank DoyleDepartment of Health Psychology, School of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
Denis W HarkinStrategic Academic Research (StAR) Programme, Royal College of Surgeons, Dublin, Ireland.
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IEBon Secours Hospital Dublin · IE

Funding

Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland DC21139A01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDoctors have a legal requirement and duty of care to ensure patients are enabled to make an informed decision about their treatment, including discussion of the benefits, risks and alternatives to a procedure. A patient-centred approach to consent has been firmly established in Ireland, and fundamental to this is the ability to engage in a dialogue that offers comprehensible information to patients. Telemedicine has revolutionised the way we can deliver care to patients in the modern era of computers, tablets, and smartphones, and its use has been rapidly expanded. Novel digital strategies to improve the informed consent process for surgical procedures have been increasingly under investigation over the last 10-15 years and may offer a low cost, accessible and tailored solution to consent for surgical interventions. Within vascular surgery, superficial venous interventions have been associated with a high number medicolegal claims and also represents an area within the specialty with rapidly evolving technology and techniques. The ability to communicate comprehensible information to patients has never been greater. Thus, the author's aim is to explore whether it is feasible and acceptable to deliver a digital health education intervention to patients undergoing endovenous thermal ablation (EVTA) to supplement the consent process.

methodsThis is a prospective, single centre, randomised controlled, feasibility trial recruiting patients with chronic venous disease deemed suitable to undergo EVTA. Patients will be randomised to receive either standard consent (SC) or a newly developed digital health education tool (dHET). The primary outcome is feasibility; assessing the recruitment and retention rate of participants and assessing acceptability of the intervention. Secondary outcomes include knowledge retention, anxiety and satisfaction. This feasibility trial is designed to recruit 40 patients, which will allow for a moderate dropout rate. This pilot study will inform the authors of the appropriateness of an adequately powered multicentre trial. DISCUSSION: To examine the role of a digital consent solution for EVTA. This may improve and standardise the consent dialogue with patients and may have the potential to reduce claims related to poor consent processes and disclosure of risks. ETHICAL COMMITTEE REFERENCE: Ethical approval has been sought and received from both the Bon Secours Hospital and RCSI (202109017), on 14 May 2021 and 10 October 2021, respectively.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05261412 , registered on 1 March 2022.

Indexed as

ConsentDigital consentEndovenous thermal ablationHealth education toolVascular surgeryVenous disease

Identifiers

PMID37349825
PMCPMC10286428
OpenAlexW4381683555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.