ArticleJournal of translational medicine2023
Construction and validation of prognostic models in critically Ill patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury: interpretable machine learning approach.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
91 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Coagulation Risk Prediction in Patients With Liver Failure: Integrated Meta-Analysis and Machine Learning Model Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Pooled it
- Machine learning-based mortality risk prediction models in patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury: a systematic review.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Machine learning for the prediction of mortality in patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Pooled it
- Time-updated explainable machine learning predicts short-term mortality in peritoneal dialysis patients.Renal failure · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a prediction model for moderate-to-severe radiation dermatitis in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A machine learning study.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Article
- An interpretable machine learning model for early prediction of subsequent observed CRRT initiation in patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Observational
- Early identification of acute kidney injury progression in critically ill patients with sepsis: interpretable machine learning approach.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Article
- Article
- Development and External Validation of an Interpretable Machine Learning Framework for Predicting Pneumothorax-Associated Acute Kidney Injury: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based prediction of E. coli infection in hospitalized patients using a no-code analytical framework.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Development of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting intestinal necrosis in older patients with incarcerated hernia: A retrospective cohort study.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Article
- Risk prediction of sepsis-associated acute kidney injury: development, validation of a machine learning model with multicenter data.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Construction and validation of a machine learning-based prediction model for in-hospital acute kidney injury in patients with lung cancer complicated with sepsis: clinical and nursing applications.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- An interpretable machine learning model integrating peripheral blood lncRNAs and clinical variables for phase classification in chronic myeloid leukemia.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- An interpretable prediction model for severe sepsis-associated acute kidney injury in older ICU patients with sepsis: a prospective multicenter cohort study.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- From black box to glass box: explainable artificial intelligence for acute kidney injury prediction-a scoping review and the GLASS-AKI translational framework proposal.International urology and nephrology · 2026Review
- Risk factors and nomogram prediction model for prognosis in sepsis with acute kidney injury.BMC nephrology · 2026Article
- Immunoinflammatory biomarkers for sepsis-associated acute kidney injury: a multicenter prospective cohort study.Immunity & ageing : I & A · 2026Article
- Explainable machine learning differentiates necrotizing fasciitis and osteomyelitis via routine blood biomarkers.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Construction of a LASSO regression-based predictive model for recurrence of urinary tract stones.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication in critically ill patients with sepsis and is often associated with a poor prognosis. We aimed to construct and validate an interpretable prognostic prediction model for patients with sepsis-associated AKI (S-AKI) using machine learning (ML) methods.
methodsData on the training cohort were collected from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database version 2.2 to build the model, and data of patients were extracted from Hangzhou First People's Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang University School of Medicine for external validation of model. Predictors of mortality were identified using Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE). Then, random forest, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), multilayer perceptron classifier, support vector classifier, and logistic regression were used to establish a prognosis prediction model for 7, 14, and 28 days after intensive care unit (ICU) admission, respectively. Prediction performance was assessed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and decision curve analysis (DCA). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used to interpret the ML models.
resultsIn total, 2599 patients with S-AKI were included in the analysis. Forty variables were selected for the model development. According to the areas under the ROC curve (AUC) and DCA results for the training cohort, XGBoost model exhibited excellent performance with F1 Score of 0.847, 0.715, 0.765 and AUC (95% CI) of 0.91 (0.90, 0.92), 0.78 (0.76, 0.80), and 0.83 (0.81, 0.85) in 7 days, 14 days and 28 days group, respectively. It also demonstrated excellent discrimination in the external validation cohort. Its AUC (95% CI) was 0.81 (0.79, 0.83), 0.75 (0.73, 0.77), 0.79 (0.77, 0.81) in 7 days, 14 days and 28 days group, respectively. SHAP-based summary plot and force plot were used to interpret the XGBoost model globally and locally.
conclusionsML is a reliable tool for predicting the prognosis of patients with S-AKI. SHAP methods were used to explain intrinsic information of the XGBoost model, which may prove clinically useful and help clinicians tailor precise management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.