Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37349774›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2023

Construction and validation of prognostic models in critically Ill patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury: interpretable machine learning approach.

Zhiyan Fan, Jiamei Jiang, Chen Xiao, Youlei Chen, Quan Xia, Juan Wang, Mengjuan Fang, Zesheng Wu, Fanghui Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zhiyan FanDepartment of Emergency, Hangzhou First People's Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 310006, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Jiamei JiangDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 310003, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Chen XiaoDepartment of Emergency, Hangzhou First People's Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 310006, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Youlei ChenDepartment of Emergency, Hangzhou First People's Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 310006, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Quan XiaDepartment of Emergency, Hangzhou First People's Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 310006, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Juan WangDepartment of Emergency, Hangzhou First People's Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 310006, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Mengjuan FangDepartment of Emergency, Hangzhou First People's Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 310006, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Zesheng WuDepartment of Emergency, Hangzhou First People's Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 310006, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Fanghui ChenDepartment of Emergency, Hangzhou First People's Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 310006, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China. chenfanghui126@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication in critically ill patients with sepsis and is often associated with a poor prognosis. We aimed to construct and validate an interpretable prognostic prediction model for patients with sepsis-associated AKI (S-AKI) using machine learning (ML) methods.

methodsData on the training cohort were collected from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database version 2.2 to build the model, and data of patients were extracted from Hangzhou First People's Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang University School of Medicine for external validation of model. Predictors of mortality were identified using Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE). Then, random forest, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), multilayer perceptron classifier, support vector classifier, and logistic regression were used to establish a prognosis prediction model for 7, 14, and 28 days after intensive care unit (ICU) admission, respectively. Prediction performance was assessed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and decision curve analysis (DCA). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used to interpret the ML models.

resultsIn total, 2599 patients with S-AKI were included in the analysis. Forty variables were selected for the model development. According to the areas under the ROC curve (AUC) and DCA results for the training cohort, XGBoost model exhibited excellent performance with F1 Score of 0.847, 0.715, 0.765 and AUC (95% CI) of 0.91 (0.90, 0.92), 0.78 (0.76, 0.80), and 0.83 (0.81, 0.85) in 7 days, 14 days and 28 days group, respectively. It also demonstrated excellent discrimination in the external validation cohort. Its AUC (95% CI) was 0.81 (0.79, 0.83), 0.75 (0.73, 0.77), 0.79 (0.77, 0.81) in 7 days, 14 days and 28 days group, respectively. SHAP-based summary plot and force plot were used to interpret the XGBoost model globally and locally.

conclusionsML is a reliable tool for predicting the prognosis of patients with S-AKI. SHAP methods were used to explain intrinsic information of the XGBoost model, which may prove clinically useful and help clinicians tailor precise management.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjurySepsisCritical IllnessHumansMachine LearningPrognosisAcute kidney injuryCritical illnessMachine learningMIMIC-IV databaseMortalityPrognosisSepsisSHAP

Identifiers

PMID37349774
PMCPMC10286378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.