Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37349755›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2023

Using three-dimensional printed models for trainee orbital fracture education.

Martina Rama, Lauren Schlegel, Douglas Wisner, Robert Pugliese, Sathyadeepak Ramesh, Robert Penne, Alison Watson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Three-Dimensional Printing in Pediatric Orthopaedics: Cost Analysis and Emerging Applications.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Etiology and patterns of mandibular fractures in cats.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Martina RamaSidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Lauren SchlegelSidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Douglas WisnerCataract and Primary Eye Care, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Robert PuglieseJefferson Health Design Lab, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Sathyadeepak RameshOculoplastic and Orbital Surgery, Wills Eye Hospital, 840 Walnut Street, Suite 910, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Robert PenneOculoplastic and Orbital Surgery, Wills Eye Hospital, 840 Walnut Street, Suite 910, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Alison WatsonOculoplastic and Orbital Surgery, Wills Eye Hospital, 840 Walnut Street, Suite 910, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA. hugginsab@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThree-dimensional printing is an underutilized technology in ophthalmology training; its use must be explored in complex educational scenarios. This study described a novel approach to trainee education of orbital fracture repair utilizing three-dimensional (3D) printed models as a teaching tool.

methodsOphthalmology residents and oculoplastic fellows from multiple training institutions underwent an educational session on orbital fractures, learning through four different models. Participants analyzed orbital fractures through computerized tomography (CT) imaging alone and then utilizing CT imaging with the aid of a 3D printed model. Participants completed a questionnaire assessing their understanding of the fracture pattern and surgical approach. After the training, participants were surveyed on the impact of the educational session. Components of the training were rated by participants on a 5-point Likert scale.

resultsA statistically significant difference (p < .05) was found in participant confidence conceptualizing the anatomic boundaries of the fracture and planning the orbital fracture approach for repair of three out of four models on pre-test post-test analysis. On exit questionnaire, 84.3% of participants thought the models were a useful tool for surgical planning, 94.8% of participants thought the models were a useful tool for conceptualizing the anatomic boundaries of the fracture, 94.8% of participants thought the models were a useful tool for orbital fracture training, and 89.5% of participants thought the exercise was helpful.

conclusionThis study supports the value of 3D printed models of orbital fractures as an effective tool for ophthalmology trainee education to improve understanding and visualization of complex anatomical space and pathology. Given the limited opportunities trainees may have for hands-on orbital fracture practice, 3D printed models provide an accessible way to enhance training.

Indexed as

Orbital FracturesHumansLearningModels, AnatomicPrinting, Three-DimensionalTomography, X-Ray Computed3D printingEducationOphthalmologyOphthalmology trainingOrbital fracture

Identifiers

PMID37349755
PMCPMC10286337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.