Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37349730›Full record

Observational studyBMC medical education2023

Application of the hybrid BOPPPS teaching model in clinical internships in gynecology.

Zhengfen Xu, Xuan Che, Xiaodi Yang, Xiaoxia Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
43.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhengfen XuDepartment of Science and Education, Jiaxing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, College of Medicine, Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, 314000, China.
Xuan CheDepartment of gynecology, Jiaxing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, College of Medicine, Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, 314000, China.
Xiaodi YangDepartment of gynecology, Jiaxing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, College of Medicine, Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, 314000, China.
Xiaoxia WangDepartment of gynecology, Jiaxing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, College of Medicine, Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, 314000, China. wxiaoxia20130713@sohu.com.
Jiaxing University · CN

Funding

High education teaching reform project of Wenzhou Medical University JG2021183special clinical teaching reform project of Jiaxing University 2021YYGL13
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe traditional gynecological teaching model is not conducive to the cultivation of trainee doctors' clinical skills, thinking patterns and doctor‒patient communication ability. This study aims to explore the effect of the application of the hybrid BOPPPS (bridge-in, objective, preassessment, participant learning, postassessment, summary) teaching model in clinical internships in gynecology.

methodsThis observational study was conducted among final-year undergraduate medical trainee doctors at Jiaxing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital from September 2020 to June 2022. Members of the control group were introduced to the traditional teaching model, while members of the experimental group were introduced to the hybrid BOPPPS teaching model. Trainee doctors' final examination scores and teaching satisfaction were compared.

resultsThe control group consisted of 114 students who entered the university to pursue undergraduate degrees in 2017, and the experimental group consisted of 121 students who entered the university to pursue undergraduate degrees in 2018. The final examination scores attained by trainee doctors in the experimental group were higher than those attained by trainee doctors in the control group (P < 0.05). The final theoretical exam scores attained by members of the control group were significantly higher than their preassessment scores (P < 0.01). The scores differed significantly between female and male subjects before the internship (p<0.05) but not after the internship (p>0.05). In total, 93.4% of trainee doctors in the experimental group thought that the hybrid BOPPPS teaching model helped them improve their case analysis ability, and the difference in this measure between the experimental and control groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). A total of 89.3% of trainee doctors in the experimental group supported the promotion and application of the hybrid BOPPPS model in practice in other disciplines.

conclusionThe hybrid BOPPPS teaching model helps improve trainee doctors' learning environment, stimulate their interest and initiative in learning, enhance their clinical practice ability and increase their satisfaction; therefore, this model is worth promoting and applying in practice in other disciplines.

Indexed as

GynecologyInternship and ResidencyChildClinical CompetenceFemaleHumansLearningMalePregnancyStudentsTeachingBOPPPSClinical internshipGynecologyhSYbrid teaching model

Identifiers

PMID37349730
PMCPMC10286474
OpenAlexW4381685275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.