Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37349724›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2023

Medical resident's pursuing specialty and differences in clinical proficiency among medical residents in Japan: a nationwide cross-sectional study.

Takashi Watari, Yuji Nishizaki, Nathan Houchens, Koshi Kataoka, Kota Sakaguchi, Yoshihiko Shiraishi, Taro Shimizu, Yu Yamamoto, Yasuharu Tokuda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Takashi WatariGeneral Medicine Center, Shimane University Hospital, 89-1, Enya-Cho, Izumo Shi, Shimane, 693-8501, Japan. wataritari@gmail.com.
Yuji NishizakiDivision of Medical Education, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Nathan HouchensMedicine Service, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Koshi KataokaDivision of Medical Education, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kota SakaguchiGeneral Medicine Center, Shimane University Hospital, 89-1, Enya-Cho, Izumo Shi, Shimane, 693-8501, Japan.
Yoshihiko ShiraishiGeneral Medicine Center, Shimane University Hospital, 89-1, Enya-Cho, Izumo Shi, Shimane, 693-8501, Japan.
Taro ShimizuDepartment of Diagnostic and Generalist Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University Hospital, Tochigi, Japan.
Yu YamamotoDivision of General Medicine, Center for Community Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.
Yasuharu TokudaMuribushi Okinawa Project for Teaching Hospitals, Okinawa, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceStandardized examinations assess both learners and training programs within the medical training system in Japan. However, it is unknown if there is an association between clinical proficiency as assessed by the General Medicine In-Training Examination (GM-ITE) and pursuing specialty.

objectiveTo determine the relative achievement of fundamental skills as assessed by the standardized GM-ITE based on pursuing career specialty among residents in the Japanese training system.

designNationwide cross-sectional study.

settingMedical residents in Japan who attempted the GM-ITE in their first or second year were surveyed.

participantsA total of 4,363 postgraduate years 1 and 2 residents who completed the GM-ITE were surveyed between January 18 and March 31, 2021. MAIN MEASURES: GM-ITE total scores and individual scores in each of four domains assessing clinical knowledge: 1) medical interview and professionalism, 2) symptomatology and clinical reasoning, 3) physical examination and treatment, and 4) detailed disease knowledge.

resultsWhen compared to the most pursued specialty, internal medicine, only those residents who chose general medicine achieved higher GM-ITE scores (coefficient 1.38, 95% CI 0.08 to 2.68, p = 0.038). Conversely, the nine specialties and "Other/Not decided" groups scored significantly lower. Higher scores were noted among residents entering general medicine, emergency medicine, and internal medicine and among those who trained in community hospitals with higher numbers of beds, were more advanced in their training, spent more time working and studying, and cared for a moderate but not an extreme number of patients at a time.

conclusionsLevels of basic skill achievement differed depending on respective chosen future specialties among residents in Japan. Scores were higher among those pursuing careers in general medical fields and lower among those pursuing highly specialized careers. Residents in training programs devoid of specialty-specific competition may not possess the same motivations as those in competitive systems.

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencyClinical CompetenceCross-Sectional StudiesEducational MeasurementHumansInternal MedicineJapanCross-sectional studyEssential clinical skillsGeneral medicinePostgraduate medical education

Identifiers

PMID37349724
PMCPMC10286340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.