Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37349690›Full record

Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2023

Post-induction hypotension with remimazolam versus propofol in patients routinely administered angiotensin axis blockades: a randomized control trial.

Seung Woo Song, Sujin Kim, Ji-Hyoung Park, Yun Hyung Cho, Yeong-Gwan Jeon

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Seung Woo SongDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Ilsan-Ro 20, Wonju-Si, Gangwon-Do, 26426, Republic of Korea.
Sujin KimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Ilsan-Ro 20, Wonju-Si, Gangwon-Do, 26426, Republic of Korea.
Ji-Hyoung ParkDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Ilsan-Ro 20, Wonju-Si, Gangwon-Do, 26426, Republic of Korea.
Yun Hyung ChoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Wonju-Si, Gangwon-Do, South Korea.
Yeong-Gwan JeonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Ilsan-Ro 20, Wonju-Si, Gangwon-Do, 26426, Republic of Korea. ygjeon@yonsei.ac.kr.
Yonsei University · KRWonju Severance Christian Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCertain routine medication could result in post-induction hypotension (PIH), such as angiotensin axis blockades, which are frequently administered as a first-line therapy against hypertension. Remimazolam is reportedly associated with lesser intraoperative hypotension than propofol. This study compared the overall incidence of PIH following remimazolam or propofol administration in patients managed by angiotensin axis blockades.

methodsThis single-blind, parallel-group, randomized control trial was conducted in a tertiary university hospital in South Korea. Patients undergoing surgery with general anesthesia were considered for enrollment if the inclusion criteria were met: administration of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker, 19 to 65 years old, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification ≤ III, and no involvement in other clinical trials. The primary outcome was the overall incidence of PIH, defined as a mean blood pressure (MBP) < 65 mmHg or decrease by ≥ 30% of the baseline MBP. The time points of measurement were baseline, just before the initial intubation attempt, and 1, 5, 10, and 15 min following intubation. The heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, and bispectral index were also recorded. Groups P and R included patients administered propofol and remimazolam, respectively, as an induction agent.

resultsA total of 81 patients were analyzed, of the 82 randomized patients. PIH was less frequent in group R than group P (62.5% versus 82.9%; t value 4.27, P = 0.04, adjusted odds ratio = 0.32 [95% confidence interval 0.10-0.99]). The decrease in the MBP from baseline was 9.6 mmHg lesser in group R than in group P before the initial intubation attempt (95% confidence interval 3.3-15.9). A similar trend was observed for systolic and diastolic blood pressures. No severe adverse events were observed in either group.

conclusionRemimazolam results in less frequent PIH than propofol in patients undergoing routine administration of angiotensin axis blockades.

trial registrationThis trial was retrospectively registered on Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS), Republic of Korea (KCT0007488). Registration date: 30/06/2022.

Indexed as

BenzodiazepinesHypotensionPropofolAdultAgedAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensinsFemaleHumansIntraoperative CareMaleMiddle AgedSingle-Blind MethodYoung AdultAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensinsBenzodiazepinesPropofolremimazolamAnesthesiaAngiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitorsAngiotensin receptor antagonistsHypotensionIntraoperative careRemimazolam

Identifiers

PMID37349690
PMCPMC10286332
OpenAlexW4381616588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.