ArticleBMC ophthalmology2023
Impact of an immersive, interactive medical education initiative on guideline-based retinal disease management knowledge/competence and effectual practice change.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRetinal diseases, including wet or dry age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular edema, and diabetic retinopathy (DR), are underdiagnosed and undertreated in the United States. Clinical trials support the effectiveness of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapies for several retinal conditions, but real-world data suggest underuse by clinicians, resulting in patients experiencing poorer visual outcomes over time. Continuing education (CE) has demonstrated effectiveness at changing practice behaviors, but more research is needed to understand whether CE can help address diagnostic and treatment gaps.
methodsThis test and control matched pair analysis examined pre-/post-test knowledge of retinal diseases and guideline-based screening and intervention among 10,786 healthcare practitioners (i.e., retina specialists, ophthalmologists, optometrists, primary care providers, diabetes educators, pharmacists/managed care specialists, and other healthcare providers, such as registered nurses, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants) who participated in a modular, interactive CE initiative. An additional medical claims analysis provided data on practice change, evaluating use of VEGF-A inhibitors among retina specialist and ophthalmologist learners (n = 7,827) pre-/post-education, compared to a matched control group of non-learners. Outcomes were pre-/post-test change in knowledge/competence and clinical change in application of anti-VEGF therapy, as identified by the medical claims analysis.
resultsLearners significantly improved knowledge/competence scores on early identification and treatment, identifying patients who could benefit from anti-VEGF agents, using guideline-recommended care, recognizing the importance of screening and referral, and recognizing the importance of early detection and care for DR (all P-values = 0.003 to 0.004). Compared with matched controls, learners' incremental total injections for anti-VEGF agents for retinal conditions increased more after the CE intervention (P < 0.001); specifically, there were 18,513 more (new) anti-VEGF injections prescribed versus non-learners (P < 0.001).
conclusionsThis modular, interactive, immersive CE initiative resulted in significant knowledge/competence gains among retinal disease care providers and changes in practice-related treatment behaviors (i.e., appropriate consideration and greater incorporation of guideline-recommended anti-VEGF therapies) among participating ophthalmologists and retina specialists compared to matched controls. Future studies will utilize medical claims data to show longitudinal impact of this CE initiative on treatment behavior among specialists and impact on diagnosis and referral rates among optometrists and primary care providers who participate in future programming.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.