ArticleJournal of cardiovascular translational research2023
The Fibrinogen-to-Albumin Ratio Is Associated with Poor Prognosis in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: Findings from a Large Cohort.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular translational research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Fibrinogen-to-Albumin Ratio in Endometriosis: A Step Toward Personalized Non-Invasive Diagnostics.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Association between fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio and all-cause mortality in critically ill patients with atrial fibrillation: a retrospective study using the MIMIC-IV database.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- The Relationship Between the Fibrinogen-to-Albumin Ratio and Short-Term Mortality in Chinese Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.Cardiology research and practice · 2025Article
- Fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio predicts mortality in patients with diabetes mellitus and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Optimal medical therapy, clinical outcome and its predictors in patients with acute coronary syndrome after discharge with secondary prevention medications at University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, North West Ethiopia, 2023: A retrospective follow-up study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Article
- A nomogram model based on SII, AFR, and NLR to predict infectious complications of laparoscopic hysterectomy for cervical cancer.World journal of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Circulating mir-199-3p screens the onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus and the complication of coronary heart disease and predicts the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2023Article
- Prognostic Value of Fibrinogen-to-Albumin Ratio in Coronary Three-Vessel Disease.Journal of inflammation research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We aimed to evaluate the association of the fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio (FAR) with the clinical outcomes of coronary artery disease (CAD). All 14,944 patients with CAD evaluated in the present study were from a prospective cohort that recruited 15,250 patients admitted in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University between December 2016 and October 2021. The all-cause mortality (ACM) and cardiac mortality (CM) were selected as the primary endpoints. The secondary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), and non-fatal myocardial infarction (NFMI). The optimal FAR cutoff value was determined by using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Using 0.1 as the cutoff value, all the patients were divided into two groups: a low-FAR group (FAR < 0.1, n = 10,076) and a high-FAR group (FAR ≥ 0.1, n = 4918). The incidence of outcomes between the two groups was compared. The high-FAR group exhibited a higher incidence of ACM (5.3% vs. 1.9%), CM (3.9% vs. 1.4%), MACEs (9.8% vs. 6.7%), MACCEs (10.4% vs. 7.6%), and NFMI (2.3% vs. 1.3%) than the low-FAR group. To adjust the confounders, multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that the risk in the high-FAR group was increased 2.182 fold in ACM (HR = 2.182, 95% CI: 1.761 ~ 2.704, P < 0.001), 2.116 fold in CM (HR = 2.116, 95% CI: 1.761 ~ 2.704, P < 0.001), 1.327 fold in MACEs (HR = 1.327, 95% CI: 1.166 ~ 1.510, P < 0.001), 1.280 fold in MACCEs (HR = 1.280, 95% CI: 1.131 ~ 1.448, P < 0.001), and 1.791 fold in NFMI (HR = 1.791, 95% CI:1.331 ~ 2.411, P < 0.001), compared to the low-FAR group. The present study suggested that the high-FAR group was an independent and powerful predictor of adverse outcomes in CAD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.