Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37349632›Full record

Trial reportCerebellum (London, England)2024

Comparing Cerebellar tDCS and Cerebellar tACS in Neurodegenerative Ataxias Using Wearable Sensors: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled, Triple-Crossover Trial.

Ilenia Libri, Valentina Cantoni, Alberto Benussi, Jasmine Rivolta, Camilla Ferrari, Roberto Fancellu, Matthis Synofzik, Antonella Alberici, Alessandro Padovani, Barbara Borroni

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cerebellum (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05621200 nacompletednot on this map

Interventional Cross-over Study to Evaluate the Efficacy on Motor and Cognitive Performance of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) in Patients With Neurodegenerative Ataxia

TypeinterventionalSponsorAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di BresciaRan2021 to 2022Enrolled26ConditionsAtaxia, Spinocerebellar Ataxias, Multiple System Atrophy, Ataxia With Oculomotor ApraxiaArmsTranscranial stimulation over the cerebellar hemispheres
NCT06420271 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Combined Transcranial Electrical and Magnetic Stimulation of Cerebellum on Balance Function in Ataxia Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorI.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa LuciaRan2025 to 2026Enrolled30ConditionsAtaxiaArmsReal (real iTBS/tACS + exergaming), Sham (sham iTBS/tACS + exergaming)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Treatment of primary adult-onset neurodegenerative cerebellar ataxias.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Ilenia LibriNeurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Valentina CantoniNeurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Alberto BenussiNeurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Jasmine RivoltaNeurology Unit, Department of Neurological and Vision Sciences, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.
Camilla FerrariDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health (NEUROFARBA), University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Roberto FancelluUO Neurologia, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132, Genoa, Italy.
Matthis SynofzikDepartment of Neurodegeneration, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research and Centre of Neurology, Tübingen, Germany.
Antonella AlbericiNeurology Unit, Department of Neurological and Vision Sciences, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.
Alessandro PadovaniNeurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Barbara BorroniNeurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy. bborroni@inwind.it.
University of Brescia · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · ITGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases · DEOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITUniversity of Florence · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) represents a promising therapeutic approach for both motor and cognitive symptoms in neurodegenerative ataxias. Recently, transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) was also demonstrated to modulate cerebellar excitability by neuronal entrainment. To compare the effectiveness of cerebellar tDCS vs. cerebellar tACS in patients with neurodegenerative ataxia, we performed a double-blind, randomized, sham controlled, triple cross-over trial with cerebellar tDCS, cerebellar tACS or sham stimulation in twenty-six participants with neurodegenerative ataxia. Before entering the study, each participant underwent motor assessment with wearable sensors considering gait cadence (steps/minute), turn velocity (degrees/second) and turn duration (seconds), and a clinical evaluation with the scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) and the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS). After each intervention, participants underwent the same clinical assessment along with cerebellar inhibition (CBI) measurement, a marker of cerebellar activity. The gait cadence, turn velocity, SARA, and ICARS significantly improved after both tDCS and tACS, compared to sham stimulation (all p<0.010). Comparable effects were observed for CBI (p<0.001). Overall, tDCS significantly outperformed tACS on clinical scales and CBI (p<0.01). A significant correlation between changes of wearable sensors parameters from baseline and changes of clinical scales and CBI scores was detected. Cerebellar tDCS and cerebellar tACS are effective in ameliorating symptoms of neurodegenerative ataxias, with the former being more beneficial than the latter. Wearable sensors may serve as rater-unbiased outcome measures in future clinical trials. ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier: NCT05621200.

Indexed as

Cerebellar AtaxiaTranscranial Direct Current StimulationWearable Electronic DevicesAtaxiaCerebellumCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodHumanscerebellar AtaxiaTranscranial alternating current stimulationTranscranial direct current StimulationWearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID37349632
PMCPMC10951038
OpenAlexW4381715220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.