ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2024
Diagnostic gastrointestinal markers in primary lung cancer and pulmonary metastases.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma of the lung: integrating molecular landscape, imaging phenotypes, and translational therapeutic strategies.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Review
- Diagnosing carcinoma origin in ultrasound-guided needle biopsies: a context-driven approach anchored in site-specific immunohistochemical markers.Diagnostic pathology · 2026Article
- Cadherin 17 and digestive cancers: from diagnostic to therapeutic opportunities.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2026Review
- Targeting GPA33 with CAR-macrophages: a novel immunotherapeutic approach for colorectal cancer.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- A case report of primary mucinous adenocarcinoma of the thymus and review of the literature.Journal of surgical case reports · 2025Article
- Immunohistochemical TTF-1 and Napsin a Expression in Gastrointestinal Adenocarcinomas-Low Frequency but an Important Pitfall.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Ovarian endometrioid carcinoma with a sex cord-like pattern: a morphological, immunohistochemical, and molecular analysis.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2025Article
- TTF-1 is a highly sensitive but not fully specific marker for pulmonary and thyroidal cancer: a tissue microarray study evaluating more than 17,000 tumors from 152 different tumor entities.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2024Article
- Development of a Second Primary Lung Cancer Following a Primary Breast Cancer: A Case Series.Journal of investigative medicine high impact case reportsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Histopathological diagnosis of pulmonary tumors is essential for treatment decisions. The distinction between primary lung adenocarcinoma and pulmonary metastasis from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract may be difficult. Therefore, we compared the diagnostic value of several immunohistochemical markers in pulmonary tumors. Tissue microarrays from 629 resected primary lung cancers and 422 resected pulmonary epithelial metastases from various sites (whereof 275 colorectal cancer) were investigated for the immunohistochemical expression of CDH17, GPA33, MUC2, MUC6, SATB2, and SMAD4, for comparison with CDX2, CK20, CK7, and TTF-1. The most sensitive markers for GI origin were GPA33 (positive in 98%, 60%, and 100% of pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer, pancreatic cancer, and other GI adenocarcinomas, respectively), CDX2 (99/40/100%), and CDH17 (99/0/100%). In comparison, SATB2 and CK20 showed higher specificity, with expression in 5% and 10% of mucinous primary lung adenocarcinomas and both in 0% of TTF-1-negative non-mucinous primary lung adenocarcinomas (25-50% and 5-16%, respectively, for GPA33/CDX2/CDH17). MUC2 was negative in all primary lung cancers, but positive only in less than half of pulmonary metastases from mucinous adenocarcinomas from other organs. Combining six GI markers did not perfectly separate primary lung cancers from pulmonary metastases including subgroups such as mucinous adenocarcinomas or CK7-positive GI tract metastases. This comprehensive comparison suggests that CDH17, GPA33, and SATB2 may be used as equivalent alternatives to CDX2 and CK20. However, no single or combination of markers can categorically distinguish primary lung cancers from metastatic GI tract cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.