ArticleInternational journal of behavioral medicine2024
Exploring Disparities in Behavioral Health Service Use in the Early Stages of the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Article in International journal of behavioral medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recognising the heterogeneity of Indigenous Peoples during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review across Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the USA.BMJ public health · 2024Article
- Adult psychiatric inpatient admissions and length of stay before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in a large urban hospital setting in Vancouver, British Columbia.Frontiers in health services · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrevious studies examined the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health, but few studies looked at associations between the pandemic and state-funded behavioral health service utilization. We aimed to examine behavioral health service utilization during the early phase of COVID-19 among individuals with psychiatric disorders (PD), substance use disorders (SUD), and co-occurring disorders (COD).
methodsUsing the last Adult Needs and Strengths Assessment (ANSA) completed in 2019 and 2020 in a Midwestern state, a column proportion test and Poisson regression model examined the associations of the pandemic year, age, gender, race/ethnicity, diagnostic type, and behavioral health needs.
resultsBetween 2019 and 2020, the number of adults newly involved in behavioral health services increased from 11,882 to 17,385. The number of total actionable items (TAI) differed by gender and age group. Adults who were Black or American Indian were more likely to have a significantly higher number of needs that interfered with functioning (β = 0.08; CI [0.06, 0.09]), (β = 0.16; CI [0.08, 0.23]), respectively, than White peers. Individuals with COD showed the highest number of needs (β = 0.27; CI [0.26, 0.28]) when compared to the needs of individuals with psychiatric disorders, after controlling for year, age, gender, and race/ethnicity.
conclusionsAdditional research is needed to better understand the intersections of age, gender identity, race/ethnicity, the complexity of needs, and useful strengths. The involvement of practitioners, service organizations, researchers, and policymakers will be required to provide accessible, effective behavioral health services with cultural and developmental adaptations to support recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.