Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37349591›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2023

A proposed difficulty grading system for laparoscopic bile duct exploration: benefits to clinical practice, training and research.

Ahmad H M Nassar, Mahmoud Sallam, Khurram S Khan, Rhona Kilpatrick, Samer Zino, Tarek Z Katbeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Intraoperative Cholangiogram Interpretation for Laparoscopic Transcystic Bile Duct Exploration: Is Concurrence Possible?Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ahmad H M NassarLaparoscopic Biliary Unit, University Hospital Monklands, Airdrie, Scotland, UK. ahmad.nassar@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7878-7024
Mahmoud SallamLaparoscopic Biliary Unit, University Hospital Monklands, Airdrie, Scotland, UK.
Khurram S KhanLaparoscopic Biliary Unit, University Hospital Monklands, Airdrie, Scotland, UK.
Rhona KilpatrickLaparoscopic Biliary Unit, University Hospital Monklands, Airdrie, Scotland, UK.
Samer ZinoLaparoscopic Biliary Unit, University Hospital Monklands, Airdrie, Scotland, UK.
Tarek Z KatbehLaparoscopic Biliary Unit, University Hospital Monklands, Airdrie, Scotland, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA gap remains between the mounting evidence for single session management of bile duct stones and the adoption of this approach. Laparoscopic bile duct exploration (LBDE) is limited by the scarcity of training opportunities and adequate equipment and by the perception that the technique requires a high skill-set. The aim of this study was to create a new classification of difficulty based on operative characteristics and to stratify postoperative outcomes of easy vs. difficult LBDE irrespective of the surgeon's experience.

methodsA cohort of 1335 LBDEs was classified according to the location, number and size of ductal stones, the retrieval technique, utilisation of choledochoscopy and specific biliary pathologies encountered. A combination of features indicated easy (Grades I and II A & B) or difficult (Grades III A and B, IV and V) transcystic or transcholedochal explorations.

results78.3% of patients with acute cholecystitis or pancreatitis, 37% with jaundice and 46% with cholangitis had easy explorations. Difficult explorations were more likely to present as emergencies, with obstructive jaundice, previous sphincterotomy and dilated bile ducts on ultrasound scans. 77.7% of easy explorations were transcystic and 62.3% of difficult explorations transductal. Choledochoscopy was utilised in 23.4% of easy vs. 98% of difficult explorations. The use of biliary drains, open conversions, median operative time, biliary-related complications, hospital stay, readmissions, and retained stones increased with the difficulty grade. Grades I and II patients had 2 or more hospital episodes in 26.5% vs. 41.2% for grades III to V. There were 2 deaths in difficulty Grade V and one in Grade IIB.

conclusionDifficulty grading of LBDE is useful in predicting outcomes and facilitating comparison between studies. It ensures fair structuring and assessment of training and progress of the learning curve. LBDEs were easy in 72% with 77% completed transcystically. This may encourage more units to adopt this approach.

Indexed as

Cholecystectomy, LaparoscopicCholedocholithiasisGallstonesLaparoscopyBile DuctsCatheterizationCommon Bile DuctHumansCholedochoscopyCholedochotomyDifficulty gradingImpacted bile duct stonesLaparoscopic bile duct explorationTranascysticWiper Blade Manoeuvre WBM

Identifiers

PMID37349591
PMCPMC10462500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.