Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37349541›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2023

Ensuring fair, safe, and interpretable artificial intelligence-based prediction tools in a real-world oncological setting.

Renee George, Benjamin Ellis, Andrew West, Alex Graff, Stephen Weaver, Michelle Abramowski, Katelin Brown, Lauren Kerr, Sheng-Chieh Lu, Christine Swisher and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Renee George *The Ronin Project, San Mateo, CA, USA.
Benjamin Ellis *The Ronin Project, San Mateo, CA, USA.
Andrew WestThe Ronin Project, San Mateo, CA, USA.
Alex GraffThe Ronin Project, San Mateo, CA, USA.
Stephen WeaverThe Ronin Project, San Mateo, CA, USA.
Michelle AbramowskiThe Ronin Project, San Mateo, CA, USA.
Katelin BrownThe Ronin Project, San Mateo, CA, USA.
Lauren KerrThe Ronin Project, San Mateo, CA, USA.
Sheng-Chieh LuSection of Patient-Centered Analytic, Division of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6685-1524
Christine SwisherThe Ronin Project, San Mateo, CA, USA.
Chris Sidey-GibbonsSection of Patient-Centered Analytic, Division of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. cgibbons@mdanderson.org.
Ronin Institute · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USLarry Ellison Foundation · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer patients often experience treatment-related symptoms which, if uncontrolled, may require emergency department admission. We developed models identifying breast or genitourinary cancer patients at the risk of attending emergency department (ED) within 30-days and demonstrated the development, validation, and proactive approach to in-production monitoring of an artificial intelligence-based predictive model during a 3-month simulated deployment at a cancer hospital in the United States.

methodsWe used routinely-collected electronic health record data to develop our predictive models. We evaluated models including a variational autoencoder k-nearest neighbors algorithm (VAE-kNN) and model behaviors with a sample containing 84,138 observations from 28,369 patients. We assessed the model during a 77-day production period exposure to live data using a proactively monitoring process with predefined metrics.

resultsPerformance of the VAE-kNN algorithm is exceptional (Area under the receiver-operating characteristics, AUC = 0.80) and remains stable across demographic and disease groups over the production period (AUC 0.74-0.82). We can detect issues in data feeds using our monitoring process to create immediate insights into future model performance.

conclusionsOur algorithm demonstrates exceptional performance at predicting risk of 30-day ED visits. We confirm that model outputs are equitable and stable over time using a proactive monitoring approach.

Identifiers

PMID37349541
PMCPMC10287624
OpenAlexW4381716410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.